sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: ARTIQ, Migen, MiSoC, Mixxeo & other M-Labs projects :: fka #milkymist :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs
sb0 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
mumptai has joined #m-labs
mumptai has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
<GitHub63> [smoltcp] canndrew opened issue #147: Use standard library types where possible https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147
<GitHub82> [smoltcp] canndrew opened issue #148: Name types properly https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/148
<GitHub1> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #147: `#[no_std]` https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147#issuecomment-363033093
<GitHub66> [smoltcp] canndrew commented on issue #147: Oh, right.... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147#issuecomment-363034113
<GitHub13> [smoltcp] whitequark closed issue #148: Name types properly https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/148
<GitHub154> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #148: No, this is deliberate. This would add e.g. several hundred useless repeats of "Tcp" in tcp.rs. I don't want that. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/148#issuecomment-363034295
<GitHub15> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #147: The standard library types have a different API that doesn't follow the way every other type in smoltcp is designed. Read the documentation for the wire module to see what I mean. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147#issuecomment-363034591
<GitHub28> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #147: That said, I would accept a PR that adds `From` and `Into` implementations, where possible. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147#issuecomment-363034796
<GitHub4> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #147: `#![no_std]` https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147#issuecomment-363033093
<GitHub114> [smoltcp] canndrew opened pull request #149: Add conversions to/from std wire types (master...std-conversions) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149
<GitHub137> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #149: This broke CI. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149#issuecomment-363047151
<GitHub30> [smoltcp] canndrew commented on issue #149: CI passes now. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149#issuecomment-363052308
sb0 has joined #m-labs
<GitHub180> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #149 d26557b: I'd prefer if we had no conditional `use` statements. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149#discussion_r165943992
<GitHub6> [smoltcp] canndrew commented on pull request #149 888912f: I've changed it to use global paths instead. eg. `::std::net::Ipv4Addr`. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149#discussion_r165946363
<GitHub155> [smoltcp] canndrew opened issue #150: Packet types should implement Clone https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/150
<GitHub167> [smoltcp] canndrew opened pull request #151: Packet clone impls (master...packet-clone-impls) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/151
sb0 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<GitHub50> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #142: I realize now I could have broken this PR up into two parts. If it makes it easier to review, I can submit a PR for the work in `wire` then a PR for the work in `iface`. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363061995
<GitHub27> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #142: I realize now I could have broken this PR up into two parts. If it makes it easier to review, I can submit a PR for the work in `wire` then a PR for the work in `iface`. If this is preferred, just let me know. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363061995
rohitksingh_work has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<GitHub169> [artiq] enjoy-digital pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/4c22d64ee438...e80b4810322e
<GitHub169> artiq/master e50bebb Florent Kermarrec: firmware/liboard_artiq/ad9154.rs: add checks for jesd subclass 1 (verify that we receive the sysref and that phase error is within the specified window error threshold).
<GitHub169> artiq/master e80b481 Florent Kermarrec: firmware/libboard_artiq/hmc830_7043.rs: add template for sys_ref phase configuration for dac1/dac2 and fpga
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
<bb-m-labs> build #1182 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1182
<bb-m-labs> build #2031 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_coverage_1] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2031 blamelist: Florent Kermarrec <florent@enjoy-digital.fr>
<GitHub154> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/b1c5bcfa8b75f89685fedf68ce9f32b2c0890579
<GitHub154> smoltcp/master b1c5bcf Andrew Cann: Add conversions to/from std wire types
<GitHub100> [smoltcp] whitequark closed pull request #149: Add conversions to/from std wire types (master...std-conversions) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149
<GitHub65> [smoltcp] whitequark closed issue #147: Use standard library types where possible https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/147
<GitHub111> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #149: Thanks! https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/149#issuecomment-363083102
<GitHub192> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #142: @dlrobertson Would be great! https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363084463
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#696 (master - b1c5bcf : Andrew Cann): The build passed.
Gurty has joined #m-labs
Gurty has joined #m-labs
Gurty has quit [Changing host]
<_florent_> sb0: i added jesd sc1 checks in the artiq firmware. For now i'm not able to implement the algo you described since i'm not able to see that sys_ref clock is delayed when i configure the delay on the hmc7043 (i'm looking at REF_WLIM / CURRERR / LASTERR bits of AD9154 but i'm not able to notice changes)
<_florent_> sb0: the AD9154 reports REF_WLIM = 0, so jesd sc1 should be fine, but i'd like to increase sys_ref delay and have REF_WLIM=1 to be sure everything is working correctly
rohitksingh has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
futarisIRCcloud has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<larsc> you set the window to +-1/2 clock cycle and then check wlim?
<larsc> and move delay from minimum to maximum?
<larsc> sysref delay
<GitHub39> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/302affca913edd9b6b4062be9bea644d49aa99c4
<GitHub39> smoltcp/master 302affc Andrew Cann: Add Clone impl to Packet types
<GitHub45> [smoltcp] whitequark closed issue #150: Packet types should implement Clone https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/150
<GitHub0> [smoltcp] whitequark closed pull request #151: Packet clone impls (master...packet-clone-impls) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/151
sb0 has joined #m-labs
<sb0> _florent_, alternative explanation, REF_WLIM = 0 because the DAC is not taking sysref into account.
<sb0> we only know it is working when we see the expected behavior when scanning the sysref delay
<GitHub6> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #141 f2fc25d: I think these should go in a separate commit. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/141#discussion_r165989861
<GitHub134> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #141 f2fc25d: Shouldn't this be `impl Sub<Instant> for Instant`? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/141#discussion_r165989799
<GitHub127> [smoltcp] dlrobertson opened pull request #152: Improve TimeExceeded and ParamProblem support (master...icmpv6) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/152
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#699 (master - 302affc : Andrew Cann): The build passed.
<GitHub150> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #142: :+1: Added #152 which improves icmpv6 support and updated the description here. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363107110
<GitHub58> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #141 f2fc25d: 👍 https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/141#discussion_r165993908
<GitHub198> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on pull request #141 f2fc25d: :+1: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/141#discussion_r165993918
<GitHub81> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #152: @m-labs-homu r+ https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/152#issuecomment-363108023
<GitHub54> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #152: :pushpin: Commit e5dcaec has been approved by `whitequark`
<GitHub106> [smoltcp] whitequark created auto (+1 new commit): https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/7b5971ca244d
<GitHub106> smoltcp/auto 7b5971c Dan Robertson: Improve TimeExceeded and ParamProblem support...
<GitHub61> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #152: :hourglass: Testing commit e5dcaecefd31232bb66b31f9919b9a924ee27a8c with merge 7b5971ca244d4bbe3c7835dbcc72ace0c99f07b4... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/152#issuecomment-363108113
<GitHub37> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #152: +1 for homu!!! https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/152#issuecomment-363108119
RexOrCine has joined #m-labs
<_florent_> larsc: yes that's what i'm trying to do
<GitHub197> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu merged auto into master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/302affca913e...7b5971ca244d
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#704 (auto - 7b5971c : Dan Robertson): The build passed.
<GitHub166> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu closed pull request #152: Improve TimeExceeded and ParamProblem support (master...icmpv6) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/152
<GitHub140> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #152: :sunny: Test successful - [status-travis](https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/337585216?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification)
<_florent_> sb0: at least i know that the DAC is taking sysref into account: if i disable sysref on the hmd7043, SYNCARM is still at 1 and LASTERR is 0
<larsc> _florent_: only fine delay or also coarse delay?
<_florent_> sb0: when i enable sysref, SYNCARM is at 0 and LASTERR has a value
<_florent_> larsc: i tried both, but i don't see CURRERR or LASTERR changing when doing that
<_florent_> larsc: we are using syncmode = 0x9, so i tried monitoring CURRERR and changing the delay, but CURRERR was not changing
<GitHub54> [smoltcp] whitequark closed pull request #146: Add `netmask()/broadcast()/network()` method on IPv4Cidr #144 (master...patch-8) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/146
<GitHub8> smoltcp/master 5b7032e 寧靜: Add from_netmask()/netmask()/broadcast()/network() methods on IPv4Cidr
<GitHub8> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/5b7032e48d0cf9cd50a52601672cdf833b686b8a
<_florent_> larsc: do you have some code or document somewhere is a similar test?
<larsc> _florent_: no
<_florent_> larsc: is/of
<larsc> _florent_: DAC clock rate is equal to HMC7043 input?
<larsc> and sysref is down divided?
<_florent_> larsc: DAC clock is 600Mhz, HMC7043 input is 1.2GHz, so half
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#705 (master - 7b5971c : Dan Robertson): The build passed.
<larsc> hm, I think coarse delay should be able to trigger this, for sure.
<larsc> but you might have to re-sync the part to let the delay change take effect
<_florent_> larsc: in syncmode = 9, we do the sync on the first sys_ref, but CURRERR should reflect the phase difference between sys_ref and dac clock
<_florent_> larsc: but i'm not seeing that. I also have to double check what i'm doing on the hmc7043 side.
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#706 (master - 5b7032e : 寧靜): The build passed.
<GitHub120> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: There's no Option Type here, is there? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166001538
<GitHub189> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: `pub fn options` https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166002231
<GitHub193> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: `/// Return the length of the Hop-by-Hop Options ...` https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166002023
<GitHub50> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: There's no Option Type here, is there? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166001551
<GitHub63> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: `pub struct Header`, this is not a packet. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166001309
<GitHub10> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: `mod ipv6hopbyhop;` https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166003721
<GitHub70> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: Shouldn't this mention option data instead? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166002985
<GitHub35> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #139 c6dc8ab: There's no Option Type here, is there? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166001551
<sb0> whitequark, can you fix the release-3 build?
<GitHub87> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #139 bf04ed3: No, there may be multiple options present. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166010831
<GitHub174> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #139 bf04ed3: fixed https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166010854
<GitHub110> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #139 bf04ed3: fixed https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166010886
<GitHub49> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #139 bf04ed3: fixed https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166010998
<GitHub120> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #139 bf04ed3: fixed https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166011029
<GitHub13> [smoltcp] hjr3 commented on pull request #139 bf04ed3: Not sure I follow. Are you saying that the length in `Repr` should be the length of the options data? Or are you saying the that the `Repr` should contain options data. If the latter, we discussed this a bit [here](https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r165240227). https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/139#discussion_r166011920
<GitHub71> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: @gkasprow @marmeladapk Any update? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363124229
<GitHub43> [smoltcp] LuoZijun closed pull request #136: rewrite ::phy::raw_socket (master...patch-3) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136
<whitequark> sb0: I don't know how
<GitHub27> [openocd] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/openocd/commit/8cea56c63e14162ea3e78004b16c5e3049f9e743
<GitHub27> openocd/master 8cea56c Robert Jordens: xilinx-dna.cfg: generic tools for reading Xilinx Device DNA...
<rjo> whitequark: you are not using that commit in openocd, right?
<whitequark> rjo: which commit?
<GitHub49> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #136: Why did you close this? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136#issuecomment-363132097
<GitHub75> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on commit f6c5109: don't describe ICMPv6 in terms of differences from ICMPv4, that is, the commit message should say. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/f6c510920132cda1e3f952707f4c9ed0d9ae4058#commitcomment-27348247
<GitHub50> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #142: :pushpin: Commit f6c5109 has been approved by `whitequark`
<GitHub179> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #142: @m-labs-homu r+ https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363132762
<GitHub67> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu pushed 2 new commits to auto: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/7b5971ca244d...f06af168b498
<GitHub67> smoltcp/auto f06af16 whitequark: fixup! don...
<GitHub67> smoltcp/auto cee3f9f Dan Robertson: Add basic ICMPv6 handling...
<GitHub173> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #142: :hourglass: Testing commit f6c510920132cda1e3f952707f4c9ed0d9ae4058 with merge f06af168b4987ef8820d68f8a82d8b4c68e04cfc... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363132849
<GitHub50> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #142: Hm, autosquash seems broken. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363134096
<GitHub112> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #136: Oh, a mistake, i just delete all branch on my fork ...... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136#issuecomment-363134219
<GitHub176> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #142: @m-labs-homu r- https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142#issuecomment-363134327
<GitHub165> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #136: OMG, a mistake, i just delete all branch on my fork ...... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136#issuecomment-363134219
<rjo> whitequark: the one you pushed to m-labs/openocd
<GitHub67> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #136: ok, i will copy that. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136#issuecomment-363135685
<GitHub153> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #136: ok, i will copy that. thx. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136#issuecomment-363135685
<whitequark> rjo: not right now, no
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#710 (auto - f06af16 : whitequark): The build passed.
<GitHub78> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #142: :sunny: Test successful - [status-travis](https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/337619575?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification)
<GitHub26> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/89b39b7c19d9bbec5f4fd7558ccc6914c8f9c70c
<GitHub26> smoltcp/master 89b39b7 Dan Robertson: Add basic ICMPv6 reply...
<GitHub168> [smoltcp] whitequark closed pull request #142: Add basic ICMPv6 reply (master...process_icmpv6) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/142
<rjo> bb-m-labs: force build --props=package=openocd conda-all
<bb-m-labs> build #97 forced
<bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes
<bb-m-labs> build #197 of conda-win64 is complete: Failure [failed conda_build] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-win64/builds/197
<bb-m-labs> build #363 of conda-lin64 is complete: Failure [failed anaconda_upload] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-lin64/builds/363
<bb-m-labs> build #97 of conda-all is complete: Failure [failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-all/builds/97
<GitHub122> [artiq] sbourdeauducq tagged 3.4 at c4262ae: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commits/3.4
<sb0> bb-m-labs, force build --branch=release-3 artiq
<bb-m-labs> build #2032 forced
<bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes
<travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#711 (master - 89b39b7 : Dan Robertson): The build passed.
<sb0> bb-m-labs, force build --props=package=artiq-kc705-nist_qc2 --branch=release-3 artiq-board
<bb-m-labs> The build has been queued, I'll give a shout when it starts
<bb-m-labs> build #1183 of artiq-board is complete: Failure [failed conda_build] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1183
<bb-m-labs> build forced [ETA 20m12s]
<bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes
<bb-m-labs> build #2032 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2032
<sb0> rjo, thanks, will rework it tomorrow
<sb0> did you put a blob of glue on it?
<rjo> sb0: that's flux
<bb-m-labs> build #1184 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1184
<sb0> bb-m-labs, force build --props=package=artiq-kc705-nist_clock --branch=release-3 artiq-board
<bb-m-labs> build forced [ETA 21m56s]
<bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes
<sb0> bb-m-labs, force build --props=package=artiq-kc705-phaser --branch=release-3 artiq-board
<bb-m-labs> The build has been queued, I'll give a shout when it starts
<rjo> bb-m-labs: force build --props=package=openocd conda-all
<bb-m-labs> build #98 forced
<bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes
<bb-m-labs> build #198 of conda-win64 is complete: Failure [failed conda_build] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-win64/builds/198
<bb-m-labs> build #364 of conda-lin64 is complete: Failure [failed anaconda_upload] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-lin64/builds/364
<bb-m-labs> build #98 of conda-all is complete: Failure [failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-all/builds/98
<bb-m-labs> build #1185 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1185
<bb-m-labs> build forced [ETA 20m13s]
<bb-m-labs> I'll give a shout when the build finishes
mumptai has joined #m-labs
<bb-m-labs> build #1186 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1186
<GitHub123> [artiq] jonaskeller opened issue #915: Artiq3.4: binutils-or1k-linux dependency issue on windows https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/915
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Client Quit]
<bb-m-labs> build #199 of conda-win64 is complete: Failure [failed conda_build] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/conda-win64/builds/199
<GitHub40> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #915: @whitequark I tightened that dependency to match `artiq-dev`. Are we/should we be using different binutils? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/915#issuecomment-363184047
<GitHub157> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #915: @jordens I don't remember the exact diff between 2.27 and 2.25.1. I think 2.27 is just 2.25.1 plus our patches. The Windows build requires Cygwin and that isn't currently automated. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/915#issuecomment-363185972
<GitHub68> [openocd] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/openocd/commit/5c4a54ade6fc6877b1212112cece546a8c2fccd2
<GitHub68> openocd/master 5c4a54a Robert Jordens: kasli.cfg: use production device description
<GitHub132> [openocd] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/openocd/commit/bb7bedadfb38030dc9ea4358ce8ccd979a8eda03
<GitHub132> openocd/master bb7beda Robert Jordens: Revert "kasli.cfg: use production device description"...
<GitHub> [conda-recipes] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/conda-recipes/commit/5291c71a45d7b8cdf6bf5bb8db26014812350e6e
<GitHub> conda-recipes/master 5291c71 Robert Jordens: openocd: kasli config tweaks
<GitHub7> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #854: @marmeladapk @gkasprow Any progress? This is currently the bottleneck for Sayma development right now. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363228583
mumptai has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
<GitHub10> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #854: I'm waiting for AMC board to arrive from customs. Unfortunately the tracking number is not enough to get any info about it since there are many customs agencies in Warsaw.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363241598
<GitHub182> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #854: As part of developing for Sayma_AMC, [WUT is expected to run ARTIQ](https://github.com/m-labs/sinara/issues/468), tweak Migen/ARTIQ source and use ARTIQ build toolchain. Kudos to @marmeladapk @gkasprow ! ... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363241895
early has quit [Quit: Leaving]
early has joined #m-labs
<GitHub37> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #854: @sbourdeauducq did you send it by standard post? Polish post office does not register international parcels so you cannot track them in Poland. And it's quite common to wait 2 weeks for delivery. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363245036
futarisIRCcloud has joined #m-labs