09:51 <flux__> ooh, mlton is nowadays under bsd-license

09:52 <ketty> and ocaml-compiler is still qpl... why am i here? ;)

09:59 <flux__> well, personally the gplness of the runtime was the non-convenient part, not the compiler

10:00 <ketty> i don't have a strong opinion regarding gpl vs bsd-like yet...

10:00 <flux__> oh, and that was ancient news anyway ;)

10:01 <ketty> hmm? :)

10:01 <flux__> but in case someo ne is interested in whys, here's why: <1133814843.223684.175240@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

10:01 <flux__> posted dec 5 2005

10:02 <ketty> hmm.. how do i view the link?

10:02 <ketty> o_O

10:03 <flux__> maybe google groups supports those

10:06 <ketty> which group is it on?

10:07 <flux__> commp.lang.functional Subject: Re: Why BSD-style instead of GPL?

10:07 <flux__> by Stephen Weeks

13:17 <pango> looking at Anubis language... it seems a bit "extreme" at times (euclidian division returning the equivalent of an 'int option', since there's no exception mecanism), and laxist at others (out-of-bound array indexes silently rounded to the closest bound), weird choices

18:12 <psed> hello

18:12 <psed> what is the syntax for named parameters in OCaml functions?

18:13 <psed> i.e. how do I define and call a function with named parameters?

18:15 <ketty> let f ~x = 2 * x in f ~x:2

18:15 <psed> thanks

18:15 <ketty> no problem ^^