<aeth>
Scheme is mostly generic here, allowing you to do things like (/ 4 3) to get 4/3 as a result...
<aeth>
If you wanted an apples to apples comparison, you'd have to use integer-specific procedures if they exist (e.g. an integer division) and you'd probably want to use Typed Racket to give the proper type information. Even that would be complicated, though, because an Integer actually is an integer, not whatever fits in a certain machine size.
notzmv has joined #racket
Fare has joined #racket
lavaflow has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
lavaflow has joined #racket
Fare has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Samsarin has joined #racket
efm has joined #racket
Samsarin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dddddd has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
stratact has joined #racket
<stratact>
Hi folks, I started getting into Scheme and after talking with a couple of friends who know a variant of it, I decided Racket would be my choice. That said I have a question. How does Racket's macro system compare to other Scheme variants? How is it special?
dustyweb has joined #racket
jao has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
sauvin has joined #racket
YuGiOhJCJ has joined #racket
Fare has joined #racket
<dzoe>
aeth: Not necessary to use racket/typed - I just finished a part of a project for a customer that needs to crunch quite a few numbers (2^27-2^30 per run) and using fixnum? and fxvector? made it lightning fast.
<dzoe>
Like going from (sort lst) in about 4 hours for 2^27 to (my-fxvector-sort fxv) in about 9 seconds for 2^27
<dzoe>
On my x280 with i7 and 8 HTs (leveraging futures for parallelism)
dustyweb has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
endobson has joined #racket
Fare has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
endformationage has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.5]
dustyweb has joined #racket
fiddlerwoaroof has joined #racket
dustyweb has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
endobson has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
endobson has joined #racket
endobson has quit [Client Quit]
dustyweb has joined #racket
Lowl3v3l has joined #racket
even4void has joined #racket
mzan has joined #racket
<even4void>
HI folks! Are there anything close to Python's enumerate when using a for/list form? Basically I need to return the index (id in the for-clause) as well as the body result?
dustyweb has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
dustyweb has joined #racket
Fernando-Basso has joined #racket
ArneBab has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
ArneBab has joined #racket
ng0 has joined #racket
dustyweb has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
dustyweb has joined #racket
ng0 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ng0 has joined #racket
YuGiOhJCJ has quit [Quit: YuGiOhJCJ]
Fernando-Basso has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
orivej has joined #racket
even4void has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
dustyweb has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
vraid has joined #racket
even4void has joined #racket
iyzsong has joined #racket
iyzsong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
iyzsong has joined #racket
Fare has joined #racket
travishinkelman has joined #racket
dmiles has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
logicmoo has joined #racket
travishinkelman has quit [Quit: travishinkelman]
Fare has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
dustyweb has joined #racket
Fare has joined #racket
even4void has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
endobson has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
logicmoo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
m1dnight_ has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
jmiven has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
dmiles has joined #racket
jmiven has joined #racket
m1dnight_ has joined #racket
dustyweb has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
q9929t has joined #racket
mzan has quit [Quit: Leaving]
q9929t has quit [Quit: q9929t]
ziyourenxiang has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
BitPuffin has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
BitPuffin has joined #racket
pera has joined #racket
mzan has joined #racket
FreeFull has joined #racket
efm has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
notzmv has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
ubLIX has joined #racket
notzmv has joined #racket
<lavaflow>
dzoe: futures work for fixnums too? for some reason I was thinking they only worked for flonums
<lavaflow>
that's something I need to spend more time figuring out. I've got a flonum-intensive application that could probably benifit greatly from futures if I managed to do it right..
dbmikus has joined #racket
ermo has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
ermo has joined #racket
Ven`` has joined #racket
Sgeo has joined #racket
Ven`` has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]