<snusnu>
solnic: but did you know that one of its more awesome synonym is "mother of mappers"? and that i pushed it on mother's day?
<snusnu>
:p
<solnic>
yes I saw that
<snusnu>
lol
<solnic>
in poland mother's day is in 10 days btw
<snusnu>
heh ok
<solnic>
you can push it again maybe ;)
<solnic>
snusnu: I'm still busy with sql
<snusnu>
i'll add the synonym to the readme then … :9
<solnic>
currently I'm trying to fix sql generator itself, it produces invalid SQL
<snusnu>
the parenthesizing issue?
<solnic>
yes
<solnic>
I mean, I remember we talked about this in the very beginning that it can be done later
<solnic>
so, later is now
<snusnu>
you mean back when dkubb, mbj and you were active on dkubb/sql?
<solnic>
yes
<solnic>
mbj said "let's just generated those parenthesis for now"
<solnic>
"we can fix it later"
<solnic>
the truth is I was not aware at that point that we are actually generating syntactically invalid sql
<solnic>
I would've opposed if I knew probably
<solnic>
anyhow, I'll try to fix it now somehow
<solnic>
we have "parenthesis?" method here and there
<solnic>
with a bunch of TODO attached :)
<solnic>
I'll see if I can get it pass
<solnic>
snusnu: btw, question - how do you feel about generating spec examples dynamically?
<snusnu>
solnic: i'd say that if it's reasonably simple and easy to understand, why not
<snusnu>
if not, then not
<solnic>
gitter.me <= cool stuff
<solnic>
blah. bad url
<solnic>
gitter.im
<snusnu>
lol, i was wondering for a moment ...
<solnic>
:)
<solnic>
snusnu: I actually became alergic to complex tests that are only complex because they avoid a little bit of duplication
<snusnu>
yeah, complex tests are not worth having
<snusnu>
i mean, you know how i mean … :p
<snusnu>
i think that defining a few examples in a loop and stuff like that is ok, i've never had the need/urge to do anything more complex than that tho
<solnic>
I do that sometimes but I'm no longer liking it
<snusnu>
well, i rarely need it, but when i do, i'm good with it, it's a simple loop, and it communicates that the set of entries need identical tests
<snusnu>
as soon as there are conditions and whatnot in the loop tho, in order to make it "fit" .. i do it differently
<snusnu>
anyways, i tend to think that APIs that *can* be tested like this, are maybe crappy anyway
<snusnu>
because there's redundancy in them
<snusnu>
and while it's ok to have redundancy in specs, it's probably not so, in the code itself