04:33 <fiddlerwoaroof> luis: I don't think so, I wasn't quite sure if I put them in the appropriate places, because I don't know the codebase very well

14:33 <trafaret1> hi there

20:41 <fiddlerwoaroof> luis: https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/490

20:41 <fiddlerwoaroof> I didn't realize I had committed this code I was using to debug a macroexpansion issue

20:45 <fiddlerwoaroof> Anyways, once that's merged, I think the stream contrib is ready to merge

21:33 <fiddlerwoaroof> looks like it's been merged

21:40 <luis> Cool. Sorry I didn't catch it during review.

21:48 <fiddlerwoaroof> Do you have any idea why (let ((inferior-lisp-program "ccl")) (slime)) might not start ccl?

21:52 <fiddlerwoaroof> luis: from #lisp

21:52 <fiddlerwoaroof> "verisimilitude: I have to run now, but slime is a convenience

21:52 <fiddlerwoaroof> wrapper around slime-start and slime-start works as expected."

21:56 <fiddlerwoaroof> I'm also not sure if the failing test on buffer-streams is my fault

21:58 <fiddlerwoaroof> the test identifier is 'traditional-recipe

21:59 <fiddlerwoaroof> it seems to be flaky on my local machine

22:24 <luis> It is flaky indeed.

22:27 <luis> fiddlerwoaroof: do you have a script called "ccl"? It usually has a more complex name, IIRC.

22:29 <luis> (setq inferior-lisp-program "dummy") (slime "sbcl") ; same as binding inferior-lisp-program <-- works for me

22:29 <luis> (I only have SBCL on this laptop)

22:47 <fiddlerwoaroof> luis: i do, let-binding i-l-p around slime-start does the right thing

22:48 <luis> M-x trace-function slime-start to see what's different