<sf-slack>
<mgielda> not actively, no, but definitely happy to hear about the use case. we do use the pfsoc and bemoan the closed toolchain, but it needs some critical mass
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> currently we're supporting platforms based on user demand vs vendor support
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> sure, I myself are looking at synergis FPGA + RISC-V
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> I don't think Xylinx is making RISC-V FPGA dev board
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> I would be looking on implementing ZKSnarks accelerator in the FPGA + playing with OpenPOWER soft cores
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> nope, I dont think they will now, being part of AMD ;)
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> did AMD buy Xylinx?
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> anyhow for pfsoc bear in mind polarberry is coming soon, so in practice not sure when its coming out
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> probably not very soon, you should get an icicle instead of you want to get started now, or go ahead and play with Renode/Verilator
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> yes, just announced the amd xilinx purchase
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> I see
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> this consolidation is getting dangerous
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> for open hardware ecosystem
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> well, there will be new players
<sf-slack>
<mgielda> as for something pcie capable, netv2 should be supported
<sorear>
ignoring the closed toolchain issue entirely, I have to wonder if the polarfire's nature as a flash fpga is a problem for 'tinkering' use cases
<sorear>
the datasheet rates it for programming 500-2000 times _total_ depending on temperature
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> hmm, I see
<sf-slack>
<thestorageguy> I did not study the datasheet that deeply, I was just looking how much LUTs it has :,)