ChanServ changed the topic of #glasgow to: glasgow debug tool · code https://github.com/GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow · logs https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/glasgow · discord https://1bitsquared.com/pages/chat · production https://www.crowdsupply.com/1bitsquared/glasgow · no ETAs at the moment
ali_as has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
PyroPeter_ has joined #glasgow
PyroPeter has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
PyroPeter_ is now known as PyroPeter
electronic_eel_ has joined #glasgow
electronic_eel has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Getorix has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Getorix has joined #glasgow
Exec1N has joined #glasgow
Exec1N has quit [Quit: so long king Bowser]
d1b2 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
d1b22 has joined #glasgow
d1b22 is now known as d1b2
x56 has quit [Quit: Ծ-Ծ]
x56 has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
bvernoux has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
PyroPeter has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
PyroPeter has joined #glasgow
tomtastic has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
tomtastic has joined #glasgow
<d1b2> <transorbs> @daveshah true, not even for values but for tolerances :)
<d1b2> <transorbs> I guess you can't really get a /worse/ tolerance by combing resistors, but you can get better tolerances!
<d1b2> <daveshah> Not a better tolerance, but a narrower confidence interval
<d1b2> <daveshah> In theory all the resistors could be 5% high or low, for example (particularly if they come off the same reel, in practice)
<d1b2> <transorbs> ? What is the difference between tolerance and confidence interval?
<d1b2> <daveshah> Tolerance is a hard limit, aiui
<d1b2> <transorbs> I thought if you have a gaussian distribution tolerance, then combining resistors reduces the tolerance
<d1b2> <daveshah> You reduce the probability that it is outside that range
<d1b2> <transorbs> Ahhh, fair
<whitequark> daveshah: last time this came up i looked around and turns out some people actually tested resistors in bulk
<whitequark> it seems like they are not binned after all
<whitequark> maybe laser trimming makes that pointless
<d1b2> <daveshah> I've seen other tests where it looked like there was a hard cut off at about half of tolerance (so +-2.5% ish for 5% resistors) presumably to allow for aging/temp/whatever
<d1b2> <daveshah> but that was a while ago
<whitequark> interesting
ali_as has joined #glasgow
Foxyloxy has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Foxyloxy has joined #glasgow
josi has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
josi has joined #glasgow
m4ssi has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
FFY00 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FFY00 has joined #glasgow
m4ssi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ali_as has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ali_as has joined #glasgow
<_whitenotifier-b> [GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow] electroniceel pushed 1 commit to wip-revC2 [+0/-0/±2] https://git.io/JJLre
<_whitenotifier-b> [GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow] electroniceel 0895c15 - revC2: save one BOM line by replacing a 220k resistor against 2x 100k
<_whitenotifier-b> [glasgow] electroniceel synchronize pull request #196: WIP revC2 - https://git.io/JfXxO
bvernoux has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]