<border>
it's responding but i can't see all the cool stuff in it :(
<Leer10>
:/
<davidar>
Blame: I wonder if (crdt-based?) decentralised aggregation like I've mentioned in https://github.com/ipfs/archives/issues/8 would help with user generated content without having to manually link ipns addresses
inconshreveable has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<davidar>
I don't think the zeronet idea would scale to something like Reddit with lots of users, since it essentially involves aggregating all of them within the browser
<Leer10>
yeah I agree
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<blame>
davidar: I think we should make it an external service if we can, that requires submission. Automated searching of everything is a very expensive feature that I am not convinced we need.
inconshreveable has joined #ipfs
<border>
what are 127.0.0.1/api/* are those files build into the go executable ?
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<luca>
i /a
doublec has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<jbenet>
lgierth: not the PDFs yet -- tell them to email me next time.
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
inconshreveable has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<jbenet>
lgierth: that's a nice video! how did you find it? -- and yes, we should totally make an `ipfs-mirror` thing. wish it could go from wget straight to ipfs instead of having to be staged. maybe this can be v2.
Leer10 has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
<ipfsbot>
[go-ipfs] jbenet deleted fix/debug-err at 308ab9a: http://git.io/vZvfm
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<blame>
davidar: Nows a bad time to start this conversation as I am about to pass out. I think We shoudl design a system such that 2 things are happens. We have distributed systems to provide efficient effective and focused services, and be able to compose such services with each other. I think IPFS should focus on the FS part of the name, and we should make an
<blame>
independent decentralized service for search compatible with everything (not just ipfs).
<blame>
ie: I think "upgrading" a working system like YaCy would make more sense than glomming a search engine into ipfs
<blame>
That is why my focus until now was building "Infrastructure" services, to facilitate making new focused and composable decentralized systems.
multivac has quit []
multivac has joined #ipfs
multivac has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
multivac has joined #ipfs
<whyrusleeping>
jbenet: i was working on a program that mirrored a website straight to ipfs a little while back
<whyrusleeping>
i still have most of the source
<davidar>
Blame: did you read my last comment on that issue? I'm not intending building a search engine *into* ipfs, it's just an (independent) service that would run on top of it
<davidar>
multivac: 40+2
<multivac>
davidar: 42
<whyrusleeping>
>.>
<davidar>
yay, it works
<mappum>
multivac: how can entropy be reversed?
<multivac>
Error at 0x08: Reference not found
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
<whyrusleeping>
mappum: lol
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<davidar>
multivac: how can entropy be reversed? <reply> INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER
<multivac>
Okay, davidar.
<davidar>
how can entropy be reversed?
<multivac>
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER
<whyrusleeping>
multivac: where is whyrusleeping? <reply> probably sleeping
<whyrusleeping>
davidar: you want a keybase invite?
<whyrusleeping>
send me your email
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<davidar>
whyrusleeping: pm'd
amstocker has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
<multivac>
ipfs is the permanent web
inconshreveable has joined #ipfs
<davidar>
better teach multivac more than one factoid i guess
bren2010 has quit [K-Lined]
rjeli has quit [K-Lined]
bren2010 has joined #ipfs
<multivac>
ipfs is the permanent web
rjeli has joined #ipfs
<mappum>
is it supposed to randomly say stuff like that?
sharky has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<whyrusleeping>
its gonna get kicked it it annoys me
<davidar>
yeah, i think i can disable that, one sec
multivac has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<davidar>
taken it offline for now until i do
sharky has joined #ipfs
bedeho has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
multivac has joined #ipfs
<davidar>
ok, idle chatter should be disabled now
<davidar>
multivac: behave yourself!
<multivac>
UNCAUGHT EXCEPTION: TERMINATING
<davidar>
and if he's ever annoying you, you should be able to say
<davidar>
multivac, shut up
<multivac>
Okay, davidar - be back in a bit!
bedeho has joined #ipfs
SebastianCB has joined #ipfs
patcon has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
simonv3 has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
t3sserakt has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
border_ has joined #ipfs
border has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
chriscool has joined #ipfs
<SebastianCB>
noob question: I added 8 files of 2GB each to IPFS, are these mirrored by IPFS anywhere locally? e.g. in my .ipfs\blocks dir? That one just has 2GB so I was wondering how this adds up (compression?)?
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<davidar>
How similar are the files?
<davidar>
If they're mostly identical, then it won't store duplicate blocks
<SebastianCB>
good point, but its binary data which is different. Its concatenated doubles which are slightly different from one another.
<SebastianCB>
but youre saying that this is the place where data is stored in general?
<SebastianCB>
seems like a huge data-overhead to me, why would that happen instead of generating blocks on-demand? e.g.: prepare hashtable containing path + seek position of a file.
<SebastianCB>
a requested block could then be read from the file whenever a it is requested.
m3s_ is now known as m3s
chriscool has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
chriscool has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
border has joined #ipfs
border_ has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
hjoest has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
t3sserakt has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
voxelot has joined #ipfs
ygrek has joined #ipfs
t3sserakt has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
voxelot has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
hjoest has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
chriscool has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
voxelot has joined #ipfs
inconshreveable has joined #ipfs
inconshreveable has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
atomotic has joined #ipfs
chriscool has joined #ipfs
inconshreveable has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
bedeho has joined #ipfs
voxelot has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
t3sserakt has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
inconshreveable has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Encrypt has quit [Quit: Quitte]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<whyrusleeping>
lgierth: oh, headbite, i remember him
chriscool has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
mildred has joined #ipfs
chriscool has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
border has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
border has joined #ipfs
<mappum>
`ipfs resolve /ipfs/root/some/path` just returns the argument (/ipfs/root/some/path), i think it should resolve the path to the hash of the child link (/ipfs/somehash)
ygrek has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<whyrusleeping>
mappum: i think so too
<mappum>
i haven't worked on go-ipfs in a while, maybe i should do that as a PR
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
voxelot has joined #ipfs
mildred has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
mildred has joined #ipfs
t3sserakt has joined #ipfs
danslo has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
notduncansmith has joined #ipfs
notduncansmith has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
voxelot has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Tv` has joined #ipfs
mildred has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
mildred has joined #ipfs
chriscool has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<mappum>
whyrusleeping: hm, i was putting a dag link-walker resolver into namesys, but now i'm not sure that's the right approach. think instead it should just use a `path.Resolver` inside the resolve command?
<pinbot>
now pinning /ipfs/QmcLe1TGVV6oCMnDUtH1nQo7LmkjJH9CTgKkr9e3xnb6Rs
<kyledrake>
n/m ;)
<Leer10>
Say that there's two nodes that can't talk to each other, but both can talk to a node in the middle. Is it possible for a node on one end to get content on the other end via talking through the center node
<multivac>
That there's two nodes that can't talk to each other, but both can talk to a node in the middle. Is it possible for a node on one end to get content on the other end via talking through the center node!