aschmahmann changed the topic of #ipfs to: Heads Up: To talk, you need to register your nick! Announcements: go-ipfs 0.7.0 and js-ipfs 0.52.3 are out! Get them from dist.ipfs.io and npm respectively! | Also: #libp2p #ipfs-cluster #filecoin #ipfs-dev | IPFS: https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs | Logs: https://view.matrix.org/room/!yhqiEdqNjyPbxtUjzm:matrix.org/ | Forums: https://discuss.ipfs.io | Code of Conduct: https://git.io/vVBS0
gentoo26[m] has joined #ipfs
factormystic has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
john2gb0 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
john2gb0 has joined #ipfs
john2gb0 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
john2gb0 has joined #ipfs
D_ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
koo5 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
mindCrime has joined #ipfs
kn0rki has quit [Quit: Leaving]
koo5 has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
D_ has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
koo5 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
mowcat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
tWqaq has joined #ipfs
<tWqaq>
hi, is that possible Filecoin could replace HTTP eventually? Or I misunderstand FIL and IPFS, because FIL is running based on IPFS. So IPFS could replace HTTP eventually not Filecion?
<tWqaq>
I said FIL , I mean Filecoin ... FIL is its coin.
<Discordian[m]>
Not sure about Filecoin, but yeah I can totally see IPFS replacing HTTP
<Discordian[m]>
Hell, I'd love to see that
imfoto[m] has joined #ipfs
<tWqaq>
That is very very amazing
<tWqaq>
HTTP is WWW? IPFS could replace the whole WWW?
<jurjendevries[m]>
Filecoin is indeed based on IPFS. So you can ask money for files. Like you can give access by bank transfers or so to http files
<jurjendevries[m]>
But ipfs can also be used in other value systems. Such as freely sharing of files by commons such as Wikipedia
<tWqaq>
Yes, as I understand, IPFS can run without Filecoin?
<jurjendevries[m]>
Yes
pecastro has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<tWqaq>
So, is that possible Filecoin itself could replace HTTP, not ipfs?
<jurjendevries[m]>
Hyper text transfer protocol is just a protocol to serve files. But it's mostly centralized by web servers, a bit less centralized due CDNs. The World Wide Web is philosophy that you can link websites /web pages. Both is possible by http and ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
<jurjendevries[m]>
No, ipfs could possibly replace http. Filecoin won't, filecoin can replace centralized payment systems
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
<tWqaq>
Thanks.
<jurjendevries[m]>
Welcome into a decentralized / distributed world. What does make you curious?
xergi0k[m] has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
royal_screwup21 has joined #ipfs
baojg has joined #ipfs
royal_screwup21 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
ipfs-stackbot has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mowcat has joined #ipfs
<boramalper[m]>
Hi, is there a lightweight IPFS client library (like cURL for HTTP) that I can use to download content on IPFS without having to run a full-node? Essentially, my aim is to be able to stop relying on centralized HTTP gateways when I just want to download some content off the network.
mowcat has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
ipfs-stackbot has joined #ipfs
mowcat has joined #ipfs
decentral has joined #ipfs
jlj_[m] has joined #ipfs
Nact has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
decentral has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<McSinyx[m]>
boramalper, you can turn off features you don't want in an ipfs node
decentral has joined #ipfs
<McSinyx[m]>
for ipfs to work, you'll need to connect to certain ipfs nodes to find where the content is, so a running node is needed
mowcat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<Discordian[m]>
Curious, how does that work without running a full daemon? Wouldn't it still likely just use the same gateways?
<McSinyx[m]>
it does not run a full node, but necessary services to get it working
<RomeSilvanus[m]>
Unicorn magic
<Discordian[m]>
<McSinyx[m] "it does not run a full node, but"> I noticed it has a `spawn` mode, I'll have to look more into that. But I'd imagine it just bootstraps each time, which is still relying on centralisation. I'll have to look into it, interesting concept.
<Discordian[m]>
(I'd dive in rn, but I'm spending time with fiance)
<Discordian[m]>
It might already do this, but if it doesn't, it'd be cool if it stored a list of known nodes, and used those after a bootstrap.
<RomeSilvanus[m]>
Perfect time for getting some Mt. Dew and do some couple programing all night long
<Discordian[m]>
Today I want to do a lot tbh, especially fixing filestore
<McSinyx[m]>
mt. dew all night long doesn't sound really healthy, Rome Silvanus
PyHedgehog has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<Discordian[m]>
Tbh mt dew hurts me these days haha
codebam is now known as codebam_
stolenprivacy[m] has joined #ipfs
p3rs0 has joined #ipfs
p3rs0 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<jlj_[m]>
I was surprised that'd it work, given the resources ipfs-desktop is consuming on my main PC right now. I've heard that that software is a bit greedy; is that what accounts for the seemingly big difference in resource footprints?
<jlj_[m]>
I was surprised that it'd work, given the resources ipfs-desktop is consuming on my main PC right now. I've heard that that particular software is a bit greedy; is that what accounts for the seemingly big difference in resource footprints between the two?
<jlj_[m]>
* Hi all! New to IPFS, and DWeb generally, but eager to learn. :-)
tWqaq has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<jlj_[m]>
* Hi all! New to IPFS, and DWeb generally, but eager to learn. :-)
<jlj_[m]>
I was surprised that it'd work, given the resources ipfs-desktop is consuming on my main PC right now. I've heard that that particular software is a bit greedy; is that what accounts for the seemingly big difference in resource footprints between the two?
<Piddle>
I'm new to IPFS as well but I believe so, though the configs between the IPFS-Desktop and Go-IPFS have different default configs even though IPFS-Desktop runs Go-IPFS as its agent.
<Piddle>
No UI to run, guess it does have a big impact. If I remember correctly the Go-IPFS default config actually has higher limits than IPFS-Desktop but can't remember off the top of my head at the moment. Running a Pi 2 as a follower node to my cluster and it seems to work alright. 20-40% CPU usage, only using 300MB~ of RAM right now.
<Piddle>
You can configure the settings for different levels of hardware specs, they have settings in the documentation specifically referencing devices with low resources on some pages- I remember seeing it on the IPFS Cluster docs
<Piddle>
* I'm new to IPFS as well but I believe so, though the configs between the IPFS-Desktop and Go-IPFS have different default configs even though IPFS-Desktop runs Go-IPFS as its agent.
<Piddle>
You can configure the settings for different levels of hardware specs, they have settings in the documentation specifically referencing devices with low resources on some pages- I remember seeing it on the IPFS Cluster docs
<Piddle>
No UI to run, guess it does have a big impact. If I remember correctly the Go-IPFS default config actually has higher limits than IPFS-Desktop but can't remember off the top of my head at the moment. Running a Pi 2 as a follower node to my cluster and it seems to work alright. 20-40% CPU usage, only using 300-400MB~ of RAM right now. (The Go-IPFS + Follower)
<Piddle>
* I'm new to IPFS as well but I believe so, though the configs between the IPFS-Desktop and Go-IPFS have different default configs even though IPFS-Desktop runs Go-IPFS as its agent.
<Piddle>
You can configure the settings for different levels of hardware specs, they have settings in the documentation specifically referencing devices with low resources on some pages- I remember seeing it on the IPFS Cluster docs
<Piddle>
No UI to run, guess it does have a big impact. If I remember correctly the Go-IPFS default config actually has higher limits than IPFS-Desktop but can't remember off the top of my head at the moment. Running a Pi 2 as a follower node to my cluster and it seems to work alright. 20-40% CPU usage, only using 300-400MB~ of RAM right now. (The Go-IPFS + Collab Follower)
<jlj_[m]>
Piddle: Awesome! Great info. :-) Cheers!
paddymahoney has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<Piddle>
* I'm new to IPFS as well but I believe so, though the configs between the IPFS-Desktop and Go-IPFS have different defaults even though IPFS-Desktop runs Go-IPFS as its agent.
<Piddle>
No UI to run, guess it does have a big impact. If I remember correctly the Go-IPFS default config actually has higher limits than IPFS-Desktop but can't remember off the top of my head at the moment. Running a Pi 2 as a follower node to my cluster and it seems to work alright. 20-40% CPU usage, only using 300-400MB~ of RAM right now. (The Go-IPFS + Collab Follower)
<Piddle>
You can configure the settings for different levels of hardware specs, they have settings in the documentation specifically referencing devices with low resources on some pages- I remember seeing it on the IPFS Cluster docs
cris has joined #ipfs
zeden has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1]
<Piddle>
<jlj_[m] "Piddle: Awesome! Great info. :-)"> you're welcome! let me know how the Pi 3B+ does please, I am interested in getting some for IPFS too
<Piddle>
> <@jlj:matrix.org> Piddle: Awesome! Great info. :-) Cheers!
<Piddle>
* you're welcome! let me know how the Pi 3B+ does please if you due pursue using it, I am interested in getting some for IPFS too
zeden has joined #ipfs
jcea has joined #ipfs
NickMG[m] has joined #ipfs
ctOS has joined #ipfs
<Piddle>
* you're welcome! let me know how the Pi 3B+ does please if you do pursue using it, I am interested in getting some for IPFS too
supercoven has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
tech_exorcist has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tech_exorcist has joined #ipfs
KempfCreative has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
KempfCreative has joined #ipfs
gnyers[m] has joined #ipfs
n1` has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
n1` has joined #ipfs
sudo-apt-install has joined #ipfs
maggotbrain has quit [Quit: Gone to Croatan...]
<sudo-apt-install>
So I've just gotten into trying IPFS and have the Desktop and Companion currently. I changed the config a bit so I only broadcast pinned resources and I only pinned the docs as a test, then unpinned them. Why does it say I'm hosting 65.5MB?
mowcat has joined #ipfs
dpl__ has joined #ipfs
cris has quit []
KempfCreative has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
cris has joined #ipfs
arcatech has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
arcatech has joined #ipfs
arcatech has quit [Quit: Be back later.]
theseb has quit [Quit: Leaving]
n1` has quit [Quit: n1`]
n1` has joined #ipfs
rak[m] has left #ipfs ["User left"]
n1` has quit [Quit: n1`]
n1` has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has quit [Quit: Quit]
ipfslog has quit [Remote host closed the connection]