Tapper has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Tapper1 is now known as Tapper
ahotgluegun has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
Slimey has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Slimey has joined #openwrt-devel
Dagger has quit [Quit: Quitting]
Dagger2 has joined #openwrt-devel
shibboleth has quit [Quit: shibboleth]
wingsorc has joined #openwrt-devel
<wingsorc>
When I try to boot my custom initramfs kernel I get the error : "Uncompressing Kernel Image ... ERROR: LzmaDecode.c, 543" in u-boot. I searched the internet for this error and it seem its a buggy/limited lzma implementation in the u-boot version. Is there a generic workaround for this? I saw some references to changing the paramters fed to lzma but these options don't apply for the current codebase
<wingsorc>
by booting I mean I load the image into ram with tftpboot and run bootm in u-boot
dorf_ has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<wingsorc>
ok I got it I just needed to load the image to a higher address
<rmilecki>
ynezz: for sysupgrade it should not change
<ynezz>
so why there is still br-lan on turris omnia?
<rmilecki>
ynezz: i don't know, can you show me /etc/board.json ?
<ldir>
the busybox nslookup app change is interesting. It breaks ddns for a start.
Swant has quit [Killed (grumble (My fellow staff so-called 'friends' are about to hand over account data to a non-staff member. If you care about your data, drop your NickServ account NOW before that happens.))]
Dave has quit [Killed (grumble (My fellow staff so-called 'friends' are about to hand over account data to a non-staff member. If you care about your data, drop your NickServ account NOW before that happens.))]
ChanServ has quit [Killed (grumble (My fellow staff so-called 'friends' are about to hand over account data to a non-staff member. If you care about your data, drop your NickServ account NOW before that happens.))]
ChanServ has joined #openwrt-devel
<ynezz>
rmilecki: ah, it seems like mvebu testing was performed on different build/image e884389976, and tplink/glinet on b36b8b6929
<ldir>
it is possible to specify the server port BUT the syntax has changed from #port to :port - which also appears to cause fun for ipv6 server addresses.
<ldir>
ddns-scripts throws " 090358 CRIT : sanitize on domain found characters outside allowed subset - TERMINATE"
CrazyLemon has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
owrt-1907-builds has quit [Quit: buildmaster reconfigured: bot disconnecting]
owrt-1907-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-snap-builds has quit [Quit: buildmaster reconfigured: bot disconnecting]
owrt-snap-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-2102-builds has quit [Quit: buildmaster reconfigured: bot disconnecting]
owrt-2102-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
finsternis has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
zkrx has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<jow>
rsalvaterra: nslookup with port works here (strace nslookup example.org 1.2.3.4:123 shows connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(123), sin_addr=inet_addr("1.2.3.4")}, 16))
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<rsalvaterra>
jow: I assumed so, I saw aparcar[m]'s commit, but it's nice to be sure. Another patch dropped! :)
<ldir>
jow: does it work for ipv6 ?
<jow>
ldir: not sure, I was testing nslookup_lede, not the upstream mangled version
<jow>
denys replaced a number of things with generic libbb calls which behave slightly differently (like the # vs. : thing you already mentioned)
<ldir>
ahhhhh, I understand now :-)
<jow>
for IPv6 I would've expected [fdca:1234::1]:53 to work
<ldir>
I suspect if I use the correct syntax maybe it works. Forgot about the []
<ldir>
ha! yes, my mistake
zkrx has joined #openwrt-devel
<jow>
rmilecki: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=f716c30241d5fd9d821560f58d0af0c3ffe78600;hp=43fc720657c6e3b30c6ed89d7227ee6e646c158b - this appears to lack a uci commit ?
<aparcar[m]>
rmilecki: look at the issues, this was multiple times requested and multiple denied
<aparcar[m]>
rsalvaterra: ldir so no fallout from my patching?
<rmilecki>
aparcar[m]: ah, ok, I'll check the discussion
<rsalvaterra>
aparcar[m]: Don't know yet. I pulled, but I'm also bumping Tor to the lastest release, as well as the 5.10 kernel. :) Going to build now, actually.
<aparcar[m]>
rmilecki: i think dwmw2_gone had the strongest points on fast forward merges
<aparcar[m]>
rsalvaterra: what is the best test for these kernel bumps? If it's just compiling every kmod once I think we need a CI for this
<aparcar[m]>
jow: do you have an idea about the LuCI acl handling in 19.07?
<rsalvaterra>
aparcar[m]: Well, compiling is nice, but nothing beats run-testing. That's what I always do, at least on my (current, I switch all the time) production device.
<aparcar[m]>
rsalvaterra: ack
<rsalvaterra>
aparcar[m]: Right now it's the Redmi AC2100, since there's a lot of development going on in mt76. My other devices are more boring. :)
<aparcar[m]>
yea everyone seems to love mt76...
<Namidairo>
i don't actually think txbf or mu-mimo was implemented for mt7615 though
<Namidairo>
runs well enough for me anyway though
<Borromini>
i'm very happy with MT7615, would like to see DFS support for MT7613 though.
<rsalvaterra>
Namidairo: Really? I wasn't aware of that… nbd, do you confirm mt76 doesn't support MU-MIMO and TxBF on MT7615 (yet?)
<Namidairo>
at least I don't think I saw it advertised when I last looked at iw
<rsalvaterra>
Namidairo: It's true iw doesn't show any beamformer/beamformee info.
silverwhitefish has joined #openwrt-devel
dhewg has quit [Quit: leaving]
<Namidairo>
i don't think either is all that important
<Namidairo>
maybe the mu-mimo if you have a bunch of clients hanging off it
<blogic>
the mail queue is loaded, so the register call might need to be tried several times
<blogic>
took me 5 tries to get it to work
fredrikhl has quit [Quit: leaving]
fredrikhl has joined #openwrt-devel
<Monkeh>
Looks like there's gong to be a big split between Libera and OFTC in this shuffle..
<felix>
Only wished Libra would have allowed a transition of registered nicks in NickServ
<Monkeh>
I would think that brings additional legal issues they'd rather avoid.
<Monkeh>
To spin up quickly there's two options: No database, copy database. The latter could be problematic.
valku has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<Grommish>
No registration for Gmail accounts ;/
<PaulFertser>
xback: no, I think if the speaker input device is created then no extra modules should be needed. Thatk pcspkr is implementation for x86 legacy hardware.
nitroshift has quit [Quit: Gone that way --->]
flebourse has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
weijie has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
weijie has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has quit [Quit: leaving]
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
blogic has quit [Quit: leaving]
<rmilecki>
xback: crap :( please try to get some more details
Borromini has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
silverwhitefish has quit [Quit: One for all, all for One (2 Corinthians 5)]
silverwhitefish has joined #openwrt-devel
<Q_>
Grommish: I've seen other say so too, and yet others say that it works.
Borromini has quit [Quit: leaving]
<Grommish>
Q_: THey've probably disabled it for the huge influx.. I ended up using another one
<Grommish>
Q_: But it specifically said they aren't accepting from gmail.com.. Ah well
weijie has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
weijie has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<Q_>
Grommish: Someone on HN said that using gmail worked.
<jow>
likely to avoid getting classified as spammers by gmail
<Borromini>
are we talking about Libera?
<jow>
that's the downside if 90% of the internet ends up using the same mail provider...
<Q_>
Yes.
<Borromini>
i regged using Protonmail
<Borromini>
confirmation mail ended up in spam though
<felix>
The actual downside of 90% of the internet using the same mailproviders is that those 90% decide that mail not coming from within them must be spam.
<jow>
true
<Q_>
While most spam seem to come from them.
<felix>
My wife is actually losing business over that and it can only be efficiently mitigated by paying any of those 90% providers to use them with a custom domain.
murphyslawbbs has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
<felix>
And then you have to get over yourself to handle all your business comms through Google or Microsoft.
zkrx has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
<Borromini>
i told my brother to get an MS or Gmail account for his business... i set up a well configured mail server (DKIM, SPF, ...) but it would still get flagged way too often because they don't know you
<rmilecki>
jow: nbd: so creating "lan" bridge fails
<rmilecki>
jow: nbd: should we switch back to the "br-lan" ?
<blocktrr1>
rsalvaterra: any personal dislike against that? ;)
<rsalvaterra>
blocktrr1: Not at all, I just need to warn a friend of mine not to update to current master. :P
<blocktrr1>
It's most likely broken anyways ATM, at least they've switched to fit images and i do not have my unit anymore
<blocktrr1>
Ah okay. Then he was early to the party ;)
<rsalvaterra>
blocktrr1: Actually, he's a sysadmin, so he's a bit… conservative with upgrades. Doesn't hurt to warn him, though. :)
Nick_Lowe has joined #openwrt-devel
Nick_Lowe has quit [Client Quit]
<rsalvaterra>
blocktrr1: Personally, I'm looking forward to get my hands on the UniFi 6 LR, hopefully you guys will have sorted out the 2.5 GbE PHY configuration by then… O:)
<Grommish>
rsalvaterra: Is there a datasheet for the mt7621?
silverwhitefish has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<Grommish>
I've not looked, but you're usually handy with that sort of stuff, if not I'll do my own proper research :)
silverwhitefish has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
<rsalvaterra>
Grommish: If there's a publicly available datasheet, I've never found it… :/
<Grommish>
rsalvaterra: I just ran across a not public one, so I"m happy
<Grommish>
I want to know if I can use the external ports on the RTL8367 to connect to the mt7621, or if it HAS to go thru port@5.. gmac1 is just sitting there ;(
Tost has joined #openwrt-devel
angelsl has joined #openwrt-devel
<angelsl>
so, i'm bringing up openwrt on a Linksys EA8100 (virtually identical to the EA7300 and EA7500v2)
<angelsl>
(ramips)
<angelsl>
on 097dc943f1f9b02835c6b249b2a035679da5619f (a few commits away from current master) - kernel is fine but ubus seems to fail to start, not sure why
<angelsl>
[ 156.548901] procd: Started instance ubus::instance1[834] / [ 156.554687] procd: Instance ubus::instance1 exit with error code 32512 after 0 seconds / [ 156.698696] procd: Connection to ubus failed
Nick_Lowe has joined #openwrt-devel
nitdega has quit [Excess Flood]
nitdega has joined #openwrt-devel
Nick_Lowe has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
RoboMWM has joined #openwrt-devel
ivanich has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
ivanich has joined #openwrt-devel
nitdega has quit [Quit: ZNC - 1.6.0 - http://znc.in]
hexa- has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.9]
hexa- has joined #openwrt-devel
T-Bone has joined #openwrt-devel
SmugLeaf is now known as Guest10650
Weedy has joined #openwrt-devel
stux|RC-- has joined #openwrt-devel
dissonant_ has joined #openwrt-devel
DLange has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
skrzyp has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
dissonant has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
kab-el has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
dissonant_ is now known as dissonant
Nick_Lowe has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-1907-builds has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
_lore_ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
early has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Guest10650 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
v2d has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
stux|RC has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
GeneralDiscourse has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
canci_ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
nitdega has joined #openwrt-devel
f00b4r0 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
owrt-1907-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
canci has joined #openwrt-devel
v2d has joined #openwrt-devel
skrzyp has joined #openwrt-devel
DLange has joined #openwrt-devel
early has joined #openwrt-devel
shibboleth has joined #openwrt-devel
SamantazFox_ is now known as SamantazFox
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
_lore_ has joined #openwrt-devel
andi- has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Nick_Lowe has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
andi- has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
John[m]2 has joined #openwrt-devel
kab-el has joined #openwrt-devel
<aparcar[m]>
anyone already over on the libera thing?
<opal>
me
weijie has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
weijie has joined #openwrt-devel
<Borromini>
me!
Nick_Lowe has joined #openwrt-devel
weijie5 has joined #openwrt-devel
<karlp>
given that openwrt is a SPI project, I would suggest that _if_ a move is required, oftc might be a better choice, as a SPI sister org...
<karlp>
also, completely sidesteps this entire debacle
weijie has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
weijie5 is now known as weijie
andi- has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<Monkeh>
karlp: I've seen a few projects already go that route. Makes sense, why get trapped in the politics. Also, established and fully-functional, Libera is still a bit creaky.
<rsalvaterra>
Hm… are we migrating to Libera, then?
<karlp>
I've been on oftc for other things for years, has been way less drama and spam than any of this, even without current shenanigans
andi- has joined #openwrt-devel
<Borromini>
rsalvaterra: there are mirror channels already but i have no idea how official that is (or if that will be). I suppose that will warrant some internal discussion
<Monkeh>
karlp: Less spam? But.. that'd be so boring
<zorun>
openwrt is no longer a SPI project
rsalvaterra has quit []
<karlp>
didn't we just change _to_ SPI?
rsalvaterra has joined #openwrt-devel
<aparcar[m]>
sfc afaik
<karlp>
oh, we moved to SFC.
<karlp>
bah humbug
<karlp>
here's me thinking that was a good thing.
<aparcar[m]>
thinking what?
<karlp>
that SPI being over oftc was an extra +1 for it, above just the "not part of this barrel of monkeys at freenode/libera"
<aparcar[m]>
is Karel Kočí here?
Nick_Lowe has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
rmilecki has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
PtitGNU has left #openwrt-devel ["Quassel terminated!"]
nucleo has joined #openwrt-devel
Nick_Lowe has joined #openwrt-devel
Nick_Lowe has quit [Client Quit]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
dedeckeh has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
Nick_Lowe has joined #openwrt-devel
weijie has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<Pepe>
aparcar[m]: No, I don't think so.
linmob has joined #openwrt-devel
andi- has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
andi- has joined #openwrt-devel
Fishman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]