<Hauke> mangix: I would not invest much time into arc
KGB-0 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
KGB-0 has joined #openwrt-devel
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
dorf has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dorf has joined #openwrt-devel
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
gw826943555 has joined #openwrt-devel
swex has joined #openwrt-devel
gw826943555 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
<mangix> Hauke: it's not just arc. My normal musl builds are failing now too
dorf has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
dorf_ has joined #openwrt-devel
plntyk2 has joined #openwrt-devel
plntyk has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
lipnitsk has joined #openwrt-devel
lipnitsk has quit [Client Quit]
lipnitsk has joined #openwrt-devel
Slimey has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
Slimey has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
kab-el has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
kab-el has joined #openwrt-devel
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
Strykar has quit [Quit: /quit]
Strykar has joined #openwrt-devel
weijie5 has joined #openwrt-devel
weijie has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
weijie5 is now known as weijie
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
victhor has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
hbug___ has joined #openwrt-devel
<hurricos> I built OpenWrt on master with this diffconfig: https://paste.c-net.org/BargingSaving -- and now attempting to install the built .ipk's gives me:
<hurricos> * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-batman-adv found, but incompatible with the architectures configured.
<hurricos> The current system was compiled in the same run as this .ipk. How exactly are they incompatible?
hbug__ has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
tobleminer-tSYS has quit [Quit: AS4242423214]
tobleminer-tSYS has joined #openwrt-devel
<hurricos> Also, somewhat strangely, uname -a seems to suggest that I didn't build the kernel in the resulting initramfs/sysupgrade.
<hurricos> I clone down from a mirror which resyncs every 24 hours. So it could also be that. At that point I had probably ought to mirror feeds as well.
<hurricos> let's try pointing at a not-mirror and see what we get.
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
<Namidairo> are you sure it even upgraded
<Grommish> Where are the mvebu targets at? What Target System chipset?
mattsm has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
mattsm has joined #openwrt-devel
<mangix> Grommish: mvebu has three separate platforms
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
philipp64 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<KGB-1> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_tegra.html has been updated. (0% images and 98.2% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
_whitelogger has joined #openwrt-devel
plntyk2 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
plntyk has joined #openwrt-devel
romany has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
romany has joined #openwrt-devel
<Grommish> magix: Gotcha.. I managed to find it :)
koniu has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Darkmatter66 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
koniu has joined #openwrt-devel
rmilecki has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dorf_ has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dorf_ has joined #openwrt-devel
lipnitsk has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
grift has quit [Quit: Bye]
grift has joined #openwrt-devel
dedeckeh has joined #openwrt-devel
veonik has quit [Quit: Peace out]
veonik has joined #openwrt-devel
nitroshift has joined #openwrt-devel
Tost has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
opal has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
opal has joined #openwrt-devel
novski has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
black_ant has joined #openwrt-devel
black_ant has quit [Changing host]
black_ant has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf_ has joined #openwrt-devel
<ldir-> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=7c8c4f1be648aff9f1072ee27a2cc8f6a4a788ef am I missing something or is there no change here?
<ynezz> ldir-: working on fix now
<ldir-> ack :-)
ivanich has joined #openwrt-devel
embargo has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<ynezz> zorun: Hauke: shouldn't we announce preparation of 19.07.7 in upcoming days/weeks? :)
<ynezz> mangix: ^
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
embargo has joined #openwrt-devel
feriman has joined #openwrt-devel
<mangix> anyone have an opinion on https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14646 ? It's also applicable to base FWIW.
feriman has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1]
valku has quit [Quit: valku]
<zorun> ynezz: this hostapd issue is severe?
<zorun> fine for me in any case!
feriman has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
luke-jr has quit [Quit: ZNC - http://znc.sourceforge.net]
luke-jr has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<Hauke> zorun: hostapd has a problem in the p2p code, this is not used much in OpenWrt
<Hauke> only the specail p2p hostapd version has it activated
<Hauke> ynezz: you promised to wait 1 week for the CVE number for the IPv6 problem
<Hauke> I would do an release after that
<ynezz> +1
<ynezz> someone should send out some email, that we're planning to do that
<ynezz> don't know if there are some pending fixes to be backported or such
<ynezz> zorun: IIUC it's wpa-supplicant (client) P2P related, so probably "just" issue in wpa-supplicant-p2p
<ynezz> This can result in an attacker within
<ynezz> radio range of the device running P2P discovery being able to cause
<ynezz> unexpected behavior, including termination of the wpa_supplicant process
<ynezz> and potentially arbitrary code execution.
<ynezz> so RCE
csrf has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.7.2+deb3 - https://znc.in]
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
<zorun> ynezz: ok, thanks
<zorun> I can send the email this evening, if somebody does it first, fine
dedeckeh has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
<zorun> I would like to test and integrate the workaround for the mt7621 switch issues, I'll try to do that this week-end
dedeckeh has joined #openwrt-devel
Pix has left #openwrt-devel ["Quitte"]
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
plntyk has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
plntyk has joined #openwrt-devel
nitroshift has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
Darkmatter66 has joined #openwrt-devel
Darkmatter66 has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in]
Darkmatter66 has joined #openwrt-devel
victhor has joined #openwrt-devel
dedeckeh has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
svanheule has joined #openwrt-devel
gladiac13377 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
gladiac133779 has joined #openwrt-devel
adrianschmutzler has joined #openwrt-devel
Huntereb has joined #openwrt-devel
opal has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
csrf has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.7.2+deb3 - https://znc.in]
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
opal has joined #openwrt-devel
gladiac133779 has quit [Quit: k thx bye]
gladiac133779 has joined #openwrt-devel
dedeckeh has joined #openwrt-devel
Rene__ has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
Rene__ has joined #openwrt-devel
opal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
opal has joined #openwrt-devel
Darkmatter66_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Darkmatter66 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
dedeckeh has quit [Quit: Connection closed]
Darkmatter66_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
victhor has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
svanheule[m] has left #openwrt-devel ["User left"]
eduardas has joined #openwrt-devel
<eduardas> hello, it seems to me like even latest OpenWrt uses lua 5.1... lua 5.3 has been released back in 2015
csrf has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.7.2+deb3 - https://znc.in]
<eduardas> can anyone shine a light on why this component has not been updated for such a long time?
<eduardas> any deep technical reasons for this?
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
<karlp> think of it like python2 vs python3
<karlp> you should ask lua5.3 projects why they're not using lua 5.4..... ;)
<eduardas> to be honest, I am not deeply familiar with the lua ecosystem. Only just started studying the topic when I got to work with OpenWrt very recently
<eduardas> never really needed lua before
<eduardas> karlp: so this is an API break?
<karlp> in that case, I'd just ignore the version and look at things more interesting toyou personally.
<karlp> for using it, it's mostly the same.
<eduardas> karlp: well, there is a practical matter, really. I'm trying to build OpenWrt components using Yocto with meta-openwrt and was wondering why there is a version rollback in the layer
<eduardas> because latest Yocto has lua 5.3
<karlp> again, unless you're explicltly bothered by it for more concrete reasons, just let it go.
<eduardas> so I am still confused whether it is a serious technical necessity or just for the sake of being consistent with OpenWrt userspace
<eduardas> karlp: I'd rather not have an additional lua 5.1 recipe in my metadata. that's basically the reason
<eduardas> karlp: if I naively just switch to 5.3, should I expect things to break badly? if so, where?
nitroshift has joined #openwrt-devel
<karlp> won't you have _only_ 5.1?
<karlp> yes, you should expect things to break and or not even compile...
<karlp> you can work on that if that's your thing.
KGB-0 has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
<eduardas> karlp: in a distro, yes, you will only have 5.1, but in terms of metadata, you override the default 5.3 recipe in your layer (in Yocto terms)
<eduardas> so metadata really has recipes for two versions
<karlp> oh noes...
KGB-0 has joined #openwrt-devel
<karlp> there's support in opðenwrt for having 5.3 as well as 5.1
<karlp> if you want to do that too :)
<eduardas> karlp: hypothetically, or are the Makefiles already there?
<eduardas> openwrt/package/utils/lua/ only has 5.1.5
<eduardas> so I'll assume that was just a hypothetical statement that one can add an additional version
<karlp> look in packages.
Slimey__ has joined #openwrt-devel
Slimey has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<karlp> also, do you know hae packge/utils/lua5.3 ?
<karlp> it's been there since mid2019?
Slimey__ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<eduardas> karlp: thanks. I must be blind since it's right besides the lua directory
<eduardas> but I assume one can not trivially change the version and something like LuCI still depends on 5.1?
<karlp> sure, works out of the box right now, we're just playing games with everyone harhar :)
<karlp> this is back to, unless you really want to make this your project, jus stop looking at it. there's no "oh, I can fix this in an hour or so" magic
<eduardas> karlp: is being curious still a valid reason to ask questions in this world? :D
<eduardas> it is my experience that I learn more the more questions I ask
<eduardas> and no, I really do not expect "oh, I can fix this in an hour or so" magic. Not really common in my experience
<Tapper> So people if I make a openwrt Discord server will any one join?
<karlp> so, dig into the 5.1 to 5.3 breakingchanges, and play with it if you want, but yes, there are reasons.
<blogic> xback: you were working on the mikrotik ath79 stuff right ?
<blogic> xback: http://www.xback.be/rb912.tar.xz no longer exists
<blogic> ah, that was for ar71xx and not ath79
<xback> currently working on ath79 support for that rb912
<xback> most is done. just nand remaning
<xback> the latch driver is now OF capable and working nicely
gnustomp has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
NameNotFound has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
NameNotFound has joined #openwrt-devel
nitroshift has quit [Quit: Gone that way --->]
<blogic> ok
<blogic> xback: are the patches online ?
<blogic> i just got a rb912uag-5hp
gnustomp has joined #openwrt-devel
jschwart has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
jschwart has joined #openwrt-devel
opal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
opal has joined #openwrt-devel
dedeckeh has joined #openwrt-devel
dedeckeh has quit [Client Quit]
dedeckeh has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
grift has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
grift has joined #openwrt-devel
<Grommish> Anyone use dnscrypt-proxy2 that wants to test a version bump PR? i don't use it but someone was asking for it. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14650
Slimey has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
dedeckeh has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
<KGB-1> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_mediatek.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 98.3% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
rsalvaterra1 has joined #openwrt-devel
rsalvaterra has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
victhor has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
<stintel> any opinions about introducing a miniupnpd-igdv1 variant? see https://github.com/stintel/openwrt-packages/commit/eab8654a9e7c8eaa85873a477da9ad6437ac0173
<stintel> ehr, yeah some obvious errors :)P
<stintel> ah no, I misread
rsalvaterra1 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rsalvaterra has joined #openwrt-devel
Tost has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
philipp64_ has joined #openwrt-devel
philipp64 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
philipp64_ is now known as philipp64
Borromini has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<rsalvaterra> nbd: ping
<stintel> and suddenly wireguard says no :/
<rsalvaterra> stintel: how no?
<nbd> rsalvaterra: pong
<rsalvaterra> I've seen WireGuard coming up listening on a completely different port than the one I have configured. It's very rare, but it happens.
<rsalvaterra> nbd: testing with GTK rekeying offloading hacked out.
<stintel> rsalvaterra: it just stopped working
<stintel> ifdown; ifup doesn't help a thing
<stintel> even rebooted the device, nothing
<hurricos> Namidairo: Beyond a doubt, same compile time in the sysupgrade and in dmesg. Recompiled with the OpenWrt mirror and still no luck.
<Tapper> Hi openwrt devs. Am I breaking any of the OpenWrt rools?
<Tapper> Is it OK that I used the OpenWrt logo?
<stintel> I'm not OK with an OpenWrt discord or whatever other hipster chat alternative
<Tapper> stintel why?
<stintel> because we already have enough "communication platforms"
<Tapper> Is it just discord you don't like?
<stintel> IRC, github issues/PRs, gitlab, mailinglist, forum, flyspray
<Tapper> This is not for devs all tho they can join if they like.
<Tapper> I don't want to get involved with dev stuff!
<hurricos> Namidairo: I just needed a spare day to get my head straight. Redisocvered the -V option.
<stintel> it's not just discord, it's all of those hipster resource eating crap chats
<Tapper> Lol
<Tapper> stintel it's not going to do openwrt any harm tho is it?
<stintel> it's going to scatter communications even further, I think it actually might
<hurricos> pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: kmod-batman-adv arch=mips_24kc arch_priority=10 version=5.4.94+2021.0.
<hurricos> yet DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc' in /etc/openwrt_release
<Tapper> I am the admin of the server and it is just for chater and some help with setting things up.
<Tapper> If any posts about dev stuff I will point them to the forums or here.
<Tapper> If it gets out of hand I will shot it down k
<hurricos> Gonna kick it off without per-device rootfs / multiple targets options and see if that helps. That has to be it
<hurricos> oh no
<hurricos> I meant to control-k. I diff'd the control from the snapshot and found different kernel commit dependency -- any place I can find the commit of the running kernel?
<hurricos> s/snapshot/OpenWrt-compiled package from snapshot/
<hurricos> Woah.
<hurricos> Other packages work o_O
<hurricos> Sigh. Got it.
<hurricos> Obviously if you're installing a single package, opkg doesn't do dependency resolution for you. I followed the dependency tree manually and it installs now
<hurricos> that error message is probably only so poor because all advice points away from manually copying packages one-by-one and instead copying the whole tree and pointing to it like a remote
<hurricos> (or setting up an actual remote)
<hurricos> What I really need is a rubber-ducky extension to weechat. Copies the visual context of the current channel but messages go to nobody. It'd be as good as asking for help but with the added bonus of annoying nobody :^)
Huntereb has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
Tapper1 has joined #openwrt-devel
rsalvaterra1 has joined #openwrt-devel
NameNotFound has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
NameNotFound has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
Tapper1 is now known as Tapper
danitool_ has joined #openwrt-devel
rsalvaterra has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
opal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
opal has joined #openwrt-devel
eduardas has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
blb4393 has joined #openwrt-devel
Rene__ has quit [Quit: leaving]
dedeckeh has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
Antoine| has joined #openwrt-devel
Antoine- has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
Tost has joined #openwrt-devel
<Grommish> I just spent nearly 6 hours doing DM's on the forum working thru an issue with someone. Discord woud help make that a lot easier, but as Tapper said already, he's pointed out it isn't an Official communications avenue for reaching devs.. although, not like IRC is either most times
<Grommish> Anything official contact wise would be going thru the forum or website or corporate contact
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
<Borromini> Grommish: why DMs? something that could not see the light of day (closed source)?
<Pepe> Grommish: dnscrypt-proxy2, it seems that nobody wants to try it, yet. You can try to run tested it and also you can edit a PR a little bit. In the commit message, you can remove [] and use just packagename: foo anyway, it is possible that the maintainer, who is there listed will get to it eventually.
<ldir-> jow: This has bugged me for a while - stats graph page hangs at 'loading data' if the session has timed out. Most other pages redirect to login page but stats graphs fails to do that. Any ideas?
<Grommish> Borromini: because it involved walking the guy thru git steps, rebasing and dealing with tabs vs spaces in the Makefile. Boring stuff that didn't need to clutter everything.. Besides.. debian git doesn't have git restore apparently
<Grommish> Pepe: Yeah, I don't use it myself, but someone asked about it and I was bored.. The build seems to work and I changes the default filenames in ./files to reflect the new config TOML it uses
<Grommish> Pepe: Will remove the braces
<Grommish> and I'll remove it from the commit messages when I squash before repushing the final
<Grommish> I'm sure whoever the maintainer is will get to it and since I can't test it, Itll sit a a draft until it can be tested properly by people who know the package. If nothing else, it'll give them a legup and the guy who wanted it has it now and is able to build it locally if nothing else
Darkmatter66 has joined #openwrt-devel
<Grommish> anyone have any experience with vncserver?
<Borromini> Grommish: ok. very kind of you to do that through PM :)
<Grommish> Borromini: I'm wondering if OpenWrt can handle vncserver and a console emulator :D and do vnc over ethernet
<urjaman> iirc git restore is a new name for an operation you used to do with git checkout... and debian is quite ancient by default
guerby has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
guerby has joined #openwrt-devel
<Borromini> Grommish: no idea sorry :(
<EqUaTe> Why would you want to do that when you can just SSH ?
blb4393 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<Grommish> EqUaTe: VNC over ethernet would allow me to stream the graphical aspects from the device to a remote point
<Grommish> I want to try and turn this box into a Game emulator box using Openwrt
<EqUaTe> not sure why you're saying 'VNC over ethernet' - VNC is an IP-based protocol, so there's that, but you're running a graphical environment on an openwrt box?? why?
<EqUaTe> I don't think openwrt is really the right choice for that tbh
<EqUaTe> it definitely isn't the target market, that's for sure :)
<Grommish> Probably not, but if I view owrt as a embedded OS rather than just as router software, I can expand my use cases hehe
<EqUaTe> seems like you're adding a lot of extra work to it for yourself
<EqUaTe> also, VNC really isn't very good for low latency
<Grommish> EqUaTe: I want to look into MIPS-based console emulators ala SNES etc
<Grommish> and yes, it probabyl going to be a massive cluster anyway I go about it, but.
<Grommish> EqUaTe: The latency point you make is one of the things I was going to ask about. A local LAN connection shouldn't be too bad though, no?
<EqUaTe> I've found it usually is
<Grommish> Ah, ok.. Thanks :) I"ll have to play around with options then
<EqUaTe> eg: two systems that i have, both cabled, vnc into one from the other, can see the mouse lag (they're both laptops)
dedeckeh has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
<EqUaTe> FreeNX might be more useful
<EqUaTe> or whatever it's evolved into
<Grommish> Hmm.. Thanks :) I'll look into it. The device is a dual-core 1ghz mips64 SoC with 1gb ram, 4GB emmc onboard and a SD slot. I figure if I can get console emulation, it would just be a fun toy that's super small
mkresin has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<EqUaTe> rpi clone of some sort?
<Grommish> no.. it was a small production run of a device that was meant to be a network security device
mkresin has joined #openwrt-devel
Rene__ has joined #openwrt-devel
gromero_ has joined #openwrt-devel
gromero has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
feriman has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
<Borromini> Grommish: is that a new one or is that the one the fuss was about like a week ago?
<Borromini> is there a neat way to read out a led brightness status on openwrt or do i just need to alternate between 0/255 matches?
<karlp> what?
<Borromini> karlp: my device has a button that does nothing more than turn the led off or on
<Borromini> i suppose i just check the value of /sys/class/leds/white\:status/brightness and then write the opposite to it
<karlp> yes...?
<Borromini> just wondering if there was a smarter way to do it.
<karlp> what sort of thing would you be hoping for? another file in some other path that had 1/0 isntead of a range? I feel like i'm missing something :)
<Borromini> no it's just that this is the first time i'm playing with hotplug and buttons.
<Borromini> sorry ;)
<Borromini> i read the hardware buttons part on the wiki, and i saw the dts has the kernel key code defined. all pretty neat
<EqUaTe> Borromini: it's the one from last week or so that's had patches issued
<Borromini> EqUaTe: thanks, i'm good then :P
rmilecki has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
<Borromini> lovely, OEM behaviour replicated ^_^
Borromini has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
black_ant has quit [Quit: simplicity does not kill]
mangix has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
mangix has joined #openwrt-devel
adrianschmutzler has quit [Quit: ~ Trillian - www.trillian.im ~]
Darkmatter66 has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]