<Regenaxer>
But, not sure, he seems to insist on "on top of existing programming languages"
<Regenaxer>
Perhaps mention native/C ?
<tankf33der>
yea
<Regenaxer>
:)
<beneroth>
Good morning
<beneroth>
I guess it is about FFI, not implementation language of the lisp.
<beneroth>
so I think picolisp should be [Type-A] on C/C++
<Regenaxer>
Hi beneroth!
<Regenaxer>
yes, so native/C in pil64
<beneroth>
and probably also on Java, there is a java interop, no?
<beneroth>
T
<beneroth>
and wasm should be avoided
<beneroth>
;-)
<Regenaxer>
true (Java)
<beneroth>
bbl
<Regenaxer>
cu
stultulo has joined #picolisp
f8l has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
stultulo is now known as f8l
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
rob_w has quit [Quit: Leaving]
andyjpb has joined #picolisp
orivej has joined #picolisp
karswell has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
mtsd has quit [Quit: Leaving]
freemint has joined #picolisp
<freemint>
I want to spin up a personal website in a day. I am torn between using PicoLisp and using some static site generator. Can someone nudge me?
<Regenaxer>
Whatever is easer
<Regenaxer>
probably a site generator
<Regenaxer>
if all is static anyway
<freemint>
thanks
<beneroth>
I used picolisp (mainly @lib/xhtml.l) as a static site generator...
<beneroth>
so navbar etc. is on every page, but only once in the code. easy to edit. and I like the picolispy html-DSL more than real html for readability
<freemint>
beneroth, can you point me to a website where you did that?
<beneroth>
freemint, http://www.itship.ch - not that you can see it in the source, just a simple static site using bootstrap. had no time yet to do it better.