<GitHub60>
[smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #244 00a5dc2: So what does this achieve? One line less in route setup code? I'm not convinced it's worth adding so many functions in the public API (and you don't even validate input in some of them). https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/244#discussion_r201210282
<rjo>
bb-m-labs: force build --props=package=artiq-board,artiq_target=kasli,artiq_variant=luh artiq-board
<bb-m-labs>
build forced [ETA 41m32s]
<bb-m-labs>
I'll give a shout when the build finishes
<rjo>
bb-m-labs: force build --props=package=artiq-board,artiq_target=kasli,artiq_variant=ptb artiq-board
<bb-m-labs>
The build has been queued, I'll give a shout when it starts
richardas_ has joined #m-labs
<richardas_>
Hello, could anyone tell me why user leds aren't connected to actual LED pins on generated gateware when using MiSoC, what I'm doing wrong? code: https://pastecode.xyz/view/5150ba54
<richardas_>
I expected to see two ouput user leds in module top:https://pastecode.xyz/view/6ed8cbc0
<GitHub94>
[smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #236 dcbc010: Thanks @dlrobertson, these are my thoughts exactly. I would really like to merge this but I'm afraid using `ManagedMap` is a requirement. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/236#discussion_r201425610
<GitHub-m-labs>
[artiq] drewrisinger commented on issue #1102: I think the advantage of this is it provides cleaner parsing of the input and prevents users from doing anything too funky on command line. Semantics of logging level would still remain the same.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1102#issuecomment-403910215
<GitHub-m-labs>
[artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1045: Actually, I take that back: lack of bounds checking in ARTIQ is quite an annoying issue, which negatively affects the user experience (can be an easy way of wasting time with obscure bugs).... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1045#issuecomment-403935452