sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: https://m-labs.hk :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs :: Due to spam bots, only registered users can talk. See: https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration
sb0 has joined #m-labs
LewsThanThree3 has joined #m-labs
LewsThanThree3 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: I'm not sure what you mean by TX level. All the transceiver parameters are here:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410903423
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #1126: >> How do you measure the "block"?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410906965
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1126: > watching LED flashing.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410908435
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #1126: Nothing unusual in the log. 4.0.dev+1298.ge4d48a78;opticlock https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410909052
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1126: Could be the compiler getting slow for some reason; try using the usual Python profiling tools, and minimizing it by removing the core device interaction (e.g. like ``artiq_compile``). https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410909669
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] KaifengC opened issue #1128: Broadcast slow for large datas in `set_dataset()` https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1128
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #1126: See attached .vcd. ... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410912924
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/2008d02f4d1b4dddf69037118910e7e13bf4cc44
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 2008d02 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: runtime: use different default IP and MAC for different kinds of boards...
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #1126: Compiler only runs once per call to ``artiq_run``. How can that be the cause? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410914857
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1126: No, it runs every time you call a kernel from outside a kernel. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-410914952
K0HAX22 has joined #m-labs
K0HAX22 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
<sb0> can there be some hmc7043 sysref "feature" that does something special after a certain number of slips?
<bb-m-labs> build #1760 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1760
<sb0> ffs this hmc7043 is such a piece of trash
<bb-m-labs> build #932 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/932
<bb-m-labs> build #2547 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2547
<sb0> Because the divider has the option for nearly arbitrary phase adjustment, the stop condition can arrive when the pulse stream is a Logic 1 and create a runt pulse.
<sb0> "glitch free" they say
<sb0> pft
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has quit [Client Quit]
christel7 has joined #m-labs
christel7 has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq opened issue #1129: HMC7043 cycle slip breaks DAC sync https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1129
sb0 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
cebor has joined #m-labs
cebor is now known as Guest97035
Guest97035 has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1080: @gkasprow: the settings you are looking for are here: https://github.com/m-labs/jesd204b/blob/master/jesd204b/phy/gth.py#L205 and can be controlled by the firmware. That would be interesting that someone with a failing board do some tests similar to what you did: https://github.com/sinara-hw/sinara/issues/216#issuecomment-331890583 https://github.com/m-labs/a
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/a74958f01fe2fa5e043d33ff9c53e5149b4442e1
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master a74958f whitequark: ksupport: raise RuntimeError on reraise with no inflight exception....
<bb-m-labs> build #2548 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed lit_test] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2548 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to release-3: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/f10980de8d8ec88485f057cfcc7d0b919fbd1a30
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 f10980d whitequark: ksupport: raise RuntimeError on reraise with no inflight exception....
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/259f1576c3cadc71059252160f6859edd8856d4a
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 259f157 whitequark: Fix tests after a74958f0.
<bb-m-labs> build #2549 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed lit_test] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2549 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @gkasprow can you remind me, do you have any boards that show these ARTIQ PRBS errors? There isn't any point debugging on boards that don't show them. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410948013
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: Here is my thinking on this:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410948367
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: If it's not the input buffer, then it's got to be something like the routing of the clock to the transceiver, transceiver settings, JESD stack, etc. I think that to chase that down, we really need to look at the JESD lanes with a fast probe. @gkasprow can you have a look at that, please? Maybe trigger your scope from the HMC7043 output. https://github.com/m-labs/art
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: > If that clock looks good, we know that there is a good clock inside the FPGA, so the input buffer can't really be the problem.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410950279
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: > If that clock looks good, we know that there is a good clock inside the FPGA, so the input buffer can't really be the problem.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410950279
sb0 has joined #m-labs
<bb-m-labs> build #1761 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1761
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: Yes. But at least this way we know that the input stage is good as I assume that's common. Anything after it needs to be looked at separately by looking on the transceiver pin.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410951429
siso_ has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/7bd7b6592a531c0f78fbec1ee612f7bcf5a3bf79
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 7bd7b65 whitequark: rpc_proto: serialize keywords correctly....
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to release-3: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/f10980de8d8e...10d0c6df0091
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 10d0c6d whitequark: rpc_proto: serialize keywords correctly....
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 e8ff557 whitequark: Fix tests after a74958f0.
siso_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<bb-m-labs> build #933 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/933
<bb-m-labs> build #2550 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2550
simon_-_16 has joined #m-labs
simon_-_16 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1080: @hartytp: you can generate a square wave with linerate/40 frequency: https://github.com/m-labs/jesd204b/blob/master/jesd204b/phy/gth.py#L688 https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410955763
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: Running this loop never shows a STPL failure if there wasn't one in the first iteration:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410955870
rjo has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
rjo has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark closed issue #1107: Setting a dataset in a try/except block on the core device fails to compile in 3.6 https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1107
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #1107: This is really a bug in llvmlite escaping code. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1107#issuecomment-405771096
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to release-3: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/0982c965b14f7d623da82b5a0901a7628310e9bd
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 0982c96 whitequark: compiler: handle async RPC as last statement in try block....
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: @enjoy-digital Have you checked that the JESD core exits PRBS mode cleanly? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410956976
d_n|a has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
cjbe has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
cjbe has joined #m-labs
d_n|a has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: This loop also ends with a STPL failure, so it seems the problem would be in the JESD core and not the DAC:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410958501
<bb-m-labs> build #1762 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1762
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: This also causes STPL failure eventually, though it takes a lot of iterations.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410962822
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: @sbourdeauducq: that's probably better to restart the jesd after a prbs test indeed. (spi reset and jesd core reset as you are doing). https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410964708
<bb-m-labs> build #934 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/934
<bb-m-labs> build #2551 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2551
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: (Re)starting the JESD still causes some STPL errors as demonstrated here: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410962822 so this is not even a workaround.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410965924
Michail1 has joined #m-labs
Michail1 has quit [K-Lined]
Dave18 has joined #m-labs
Dave18 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: Yes, I have failing board. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410968825
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: I'm not saying it's a workaround. I just don't know how the DAC is exiting the PRBS mode, so don't know is STPL is supposed to work after that. On the JESD core, exiting the PRBS mode should be clean, since it does not really impact the core itself, we are just injecting prbs datas when PRBS is enabled and then get back to JESD core datas when disabled. I only se
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: I'm not saying it's a workaround. I just don't know how the DAC is exiting the PRBS mode, so don't know if STPL is supposed to work after that. On the JESD core, exiting the PRBS mode should be clean, since it does not really impact the core itself, we are just injecting prbs datas when PRBS is enabled and then get back to JESD core datas when disabled. I only se
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: (Re)starting the JESD still causes some STPL errors as demonstrated here: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410962822 so this is not even a workaround.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410965924
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: There was no PRBS when I did this: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410962822 - and it still caused the STPL problem. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410970628
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: Then this is not related to PRBS. Next step is then to see if when STPL error is reported, DAC is outputing valid data or not. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410973798
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: It is more frequent after PRBS. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410974035
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: It is more frequent after PRBS. I suspect there are two bugs here. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410974035
<bb-m-labs> build #1763 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1763
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @sbourdeauducq are you okay to generate binaries for Greg, or do you need me to?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410974727
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: Then regarding https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410970073, please do STPL test before PRBS (but not logical since we want to check the lower layers first), or add a reset after the PRBS test. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410974824
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @gkasprow how many boards do you have? how many exhibit PRBS issues? If not all boards exhibit this, does it depend on the AMC or the RTM, or some combination of the two (i.e. can you run the tests with different combinations of AMC and RTMs). Also, on the boards that fail, do they always fail? Or, are there some which only fail sometimes? https://github.com/m-labs/
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: > If not all boards exhibit this, does it depend on the AMC or the RTM, or some combination of the two (i.e. can you run the tests with different combinations of AMC and RTMs).... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410975809
<bb-m-labs> build #935 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/935
<bb-m-labs> build #2552 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2552
JesseOor has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: Again, that won't solve all problems: DAC init + STPL alone already breaks (but more infrequently) - https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410965924... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410976790
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: > According to my tests, it is a combination of the AMC and RTM... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410977161
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: AFAIR it was RTM that causes the PRBS problem. I will check it today. I'm formally on holidays until end of September (overdue leave) but without everyday dose of electronics life gets boring. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410977357
cr1901 has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
JesseOor has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: > AFAIR it was RTM that causes the PRBS problem. I will check it today. I'm formally on holidays until end of September (overdue leave) but without everyday dose of electronics life gets boring.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410978437
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: I initially thought it was the RTM too, but I plugged a problematic RTM on another AMC, and the problem stopped... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410978626
ohsix has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: So, only particular AMC + RTM combinations? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410979965
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: > @sbourdeauducq is there any way of using Sayma as a DRTIO slave using only CLK1?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410980538
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: > @sbourdeauducq is there any way of using Sayma as a DRTIO slave using only CLK1?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410980538
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: ACK. Well, let me know how you want to handle this. But, if Greg's not in the lab every day, this might be hard to debug. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410980941
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: I can send you a CLK1-only patch for you to test. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410981208
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: Thanks.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410981847
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: I'm going to be in my lab today anyway. Moreover @marmeladapk came back from holidays and can do some tests as well. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410981890
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: Again, that won't solve all problems: DAC init (when it involves ``jesd_enable``) + STPL alone already breaks (but more infrequently) - https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410965924... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410976790
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: Okay, we'll let's keep going a little longer then. But, I don't want to take you away from your holidays.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-410982460
iw00t1 has joined #m-labs
iw00t1 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<bb-m-labs> build #1764 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1764
duoi15 has joined #m-labs
duoi15 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: Where is is voodoo programming in saying?:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410995368
Waldo22 has joined #m-labs
Waldo22 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<bb-m-labs> build #936 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Exception [exception python_unittest] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/936 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>
<bb-m-labs> build #2553 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2553 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1127: This is fine, but I have issues with that:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1127#issuecomment-410997729
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #1127: I'm saying that i don't know if the DAC can work correctly after a PRBS test without reset, so if you want to avoid a reset, then we need to be sure what can be expected from the DAC. (but from my understanding since the DAC will detect the JESD stream is missing when PRBS is sent, i expect it to require another link establishment to get back to JESD data). ht
bb-m-labs has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] klickverbot commented on issue #1126: (And removing `count()` will cause the kernel to return early, whereas with it in, it needs to wait for the RTIO timeline to reach the current cursor.) https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1126#issuecomment-411015698
ohsix has joined #m-labs
bb-m-labs has joined #m-labs
rqou has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
rqou has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens pushed 1 new commit to release-3: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/df2322422debc4c9149a3a222f8dd2e9cc32e3d1
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 df23224 Robert Jördens: browser: handle windows file urls for feeding h5py...
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #965: I have seen this (the state being NULL bytes) as well after a blue screen on windows. It would be great if we could work around windows file system limitations by just keeping one previous version of the file around, e.g. the one that was last successfully used to restore the state on dashboard/browser start. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/965#issuecomment-41
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: I have 3 AMC and 5 RTMs.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411021698
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: I have 5 AMC and 5 RTMs.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411021698
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: edit, I have 5 AMCs. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411021783
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: now I'm testing 20171201b with all RTMs.. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411022823
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: now I'm testing 20171201b with all AMCs https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411022823
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/474bc7b65bac...9ce623392697
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 9ce6233 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: kasli: fix SYSU TTL directions
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 8aa88cf Sebastien Bourdeauducq: kasli_sawgmaster: add Urukul-Sayma example
ysionnea1 has left #m-labs [#m-labs]
ysionneau has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: no errors. Now will test 20171201a with all AMCs https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411028847
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: I get PRBS errors on all AMC boards paired with this particular RTM board.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411034266
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: Okay, good!... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411036225
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: Does that RTM work when using GTP_CLK1? We need to make sure this is the same issue. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411036590
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: If you prepare a bitstream I will test immediately. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411037223
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: PRBS occurs on both DACs... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411037425
vup has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ronyrus_ has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
gric_ has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
gric has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/9ce623392697...49f7a1610f47
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 49f7a16 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: sayma: use GTP_CLK1 only for all variants (#1080)
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master e2a49ce Sebastien Bourdeauducq: drtio: support external IBUFDS_GTE3
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 8b8e184 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: kasli_sawgmaster: roughly match Urukul and Sayma amplitudes
vup has joined #m-labs
ronyrus has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: OK, I got it!... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411046691
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: How does this explain the behavior where CLK1 works but CLK2 doesn't? And why did you measure good clocks on both CLK1 and CLK2? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411047154
sb0 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @marmeladapk ... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411048102
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
cr1901 has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: I didn't said that it works with CLK1. it was pure coincidence, maybe they broadcasted something else on FM when we did tests a few months ago :) https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411048654
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @sbourdeauducq are you happy with that description of what needs to be done. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411048102 https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411049284
ohsix has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] marmeladapk commented on issue #1080: @hartytp Without-sawg will show this problem? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411050384
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] marmeladapk commented on issue #1080: @hartytp Without-sawg will have this problem? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411050384
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: On my board, SAWG doesn't make any difference to this, so I've been testing --without-sawg to speed up my builds. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411050668
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: Remember to check the UART for PRBS errors before testing, as there is no point testing on a working AMC/RTM pair. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411050768
TriJetScud24 has joined #m-labs
TriJetScud24 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ChickeNES has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: And since the SMA is grounded via 10pF, this has enough impedance to pickup nearby RF. I did tests:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411052149
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #1080: I cannot say I am "happy" about any of this, but yes, this procedure looks correct and hopefully will turn up something. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411052262
meti25 has joined #m-labs
ChickeNES has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
meti25 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @gkasprow that's posted on the wrong issue, I think.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411054847
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: I've noticed that, too many threads opened... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411057282
sb0 has joined #m-labs
Madcotto3 has joined #m-labs
Madcotto3 has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
em10 has joined #m-labs
em10 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
X-Scale has joined #m-labs
epic4 has joined #m-labs
BenLand10015 has joined #m-labs
stephen875 has joined #m-labs
epic4 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
stephen875 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
BenLand10015 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
ohsix has joined #m-labs
node9 has joined #m-labs
node9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rohitksingh has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
Guest31151 has joined #m-labs
Guest31151 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master f7678cc Robert Jördens: grabber: refactor state machine
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 6cd2432 Robert Jördens: grabber: log all resolution changes...
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 99a15ca Robert Jördens: grabber: rationalize derived traits
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/49f7a1610f47...f7678cc24add
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
hammer0656 has joined #m-labs
hammer0656 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mcintosh10 has joined #m-labs
mumptai has joined #m-labs
mcintosh10 has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
ohsix has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
Steinsplitter16 has joined #m-labs
Steinsplitter16 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
vdamewood19 has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #1080: @gkasprow to make sure we don't waste time, please can you send me the binaries you were using for your tests? I'd like to check that I can reproduce the PRBS issues on my board with your binaries. If I can then I'll post it back to you tomorrow morning. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411172564
Humvee3 has joined #m-labs
vdamewood19 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Humvee3 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #1080: @marmeladapk please post here binaries I used for tests. It is on your computer on your account. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/1080#issuecomment-411179466
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
ohsix has joined #m-labs
missnomer has joined #m-labs
missnomer has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
Waggie4 has joined #m-labs
Waggie4 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
WhitePhosphorus7 has joined #m-labs
WhitePhosphorus7 has quit [Killed (Unit193 (Spam is not permitted on freenode.))]
mumptai has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
m4v8 has joined #m-labs
m4v8 has quit [K-Lined]
Guest19065 has joined #m-labs
Guest19065 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kiera17 has joined #m-labs
kiera17 has quit [K-Lined]
ohsix has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
ohsix has joined #m-labs
Guest74611 has joined #m-labs
Guest74611 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Guest69232 has joined #m-labs
Guest69232 has quit [Killed (Unit193 (Spam is not permitted on freenode.))]