17:02 <JacobWeisz[m]> That reminds me of my favorite recent targeted-code story, kentonv: https://forums.flightsimlabs.com/index.php?/announcement/11-a320-x-drm-what-happened/

17:03 <JacobWeisz[m]> So yeah, definitely would look extremely suspicious, lol.

18:47 <TimMc> kentonv: You could email them, right?

18:48 <TimMc> Or does sandcats not register with email?

19:02 <JacobWeisz[m]> Does https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/pull/1017 mean we get to delete code, by the way?

19:11 <kentonv> JacobWeisz[m], sure, it potentially replaces CapRedirector. FWIW, though, that the motivation for me working on that was for use in Workers, not Sandstorm.

19:14 <JacobWeisz[m]> I figured, the description just made it sound like code deletion was also possible.

19:15 <kentonv> (rebooting)

19:21 <isd> We'd have to port the sandstorm code over to use it, can't just hit "delete," but yeah there's a comment in the sandstorm implementation about how someday we should push this into capnp.

19:25 <JacobWeisz[m]> Should I open an issue to track it?

19:26 <isd> Sure, why not.

19:26 <JacobWeisz[m]> (I imagine there's inherent value in replacing only-used-by-Sandstorm code with used-by-Cloudflare-Workers code because the latter is likely to see greater scrutiny/improvement.)

19:27 <isd> In this case the sandstorm version also in theory has some performance disadvantages, iirc.

19:27 <kentonv> I mean, it's a fairly small utility class, so I'd say it's not a huge deal, but yes it would be nice to clean up eventually

19:27 <kentonv> and arguably right now, the Sandstorm one is far more proven. :)

19:28 <isd> Yeah, I don't see this as high-priority.