07:46 <_florent_> nickoe: I would recommend switching to upstream litex, it would ease providing support and would allow you to have an up to date version. Installing it should be pretty easy with litex_setup: https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex/wiki/Installation

08:50 <_florent_> somlo: jtag_uart should be fixed, I just pushed a change to always use the binary_mode (for jtag_uart and jtagbone) and tested it succesfully jtagbone/jtag_uart and serialboot. If still not working on your nexys4ddr, I'll do a test on mine.

11:36 <somlo> _florent_: thanks! I think this: https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex/blob/master/litex/tools/litex_server.py#L215 now prevents `litex_server --jtag` from working properly; It ends up with "unexpected keyword argument 'binary_mode'"

11:36 <somlo> I'm going to try uartbone (with jtag console) next

11:36 <_florent_> somlo: indeed, forgot to remove it here

11:38 <_florent_> that's fixed, thanks.

11:50 <somlo> _florent_: thanks, I'll try it again after my uartbone test :)

11:57 <somlo> actually, I still had my jtagbone bitstream loaded, so with the fixed litex_server it's back to working as before (i.e., `litex_client --read` mangles the register values most of the time, but writes work reliably)

11:57 <somlo> I should probably just open an issue so we don't forget, and so I can stop complaining about here ;)

13:06 <somlo> _florent_: and yeah, uartbone (and litex_server, litex_term, etc.) all work fine now -- thanks

13:31 <_florent_> somlo: that would be useful indeed if you can open an issue with the design you are testing and jtagbone. If it's on nexys4ddr I'll be able to reproduce (and hopefully fix it :) )

13:45 <somlo> _florent_: #802

13:46 <_florent_> thanks

18:23 <nickoe> _florent_: yeah, thank you. I will definitely do that, but I was just forwarded to the litex-buildenv fpreviously IIRC.

18:29 <nickoe> _florent_: it does not looke like the litex_setup.py create a virtual env like the litex-buildenv does.