<Sarayan>
does "RPI", designating a configuration bit type, mean anything to anyone?
<mwk>
... raspberry pi compatibility mode for the FPGA
<mwk>
[no, not really]
<Sarayan>
(I hope not)
<Sarayan>
(there's a lot of them in the HPS interface, do you think the sx120f embeds a pi?)
<mwk>
hmmm
<Sarayan>
I'm kind of amused by the asmdb stuff though
<Sarayan>
there a lot of "here is the routing table, all in cram, here are the in-cram tiles, with perfect rectangles disjoint from the routing, here are the peripheral blocks, in pram"
<Sarayan>
and then there's "here's a bunch of bits in the cram that are used, they're numbered 0 to 2172, enjoy"
<Sarayan>
3172 sorry
<Sarayan>
the hps interface configuration seems to be entirely build from "here are bits, enjoy"
<mwk>
you're still at the "looking for reason" stage here, aren't you
<Sarayan>
sometimes
<mwk>
cannot recommend it
<Sarayan>
indeed
<Sarayan>
these bits have amusing side effects
<Sarayan>
for instance using partial reconfiguration you can't reconfigure which clock network is driven from what
<Sarayan>
but it seems to you *can* invert it
<Sarayan>
becaues the inversion flag is in cram and all the rest in pram
QDX45 has joined #prjmistral
gruetze_ is now known as gruetzkopf
emily has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
omnitechnomancer has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]