<tomatopeel>
(ended up in this code from gx -> go-ipfs-api -> here)
jsgrant- has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<tomatopeel>
also what is the 'ready' label for on github issues on go-ipfs?
<pinkieval>
for emails, multipart means the same email has more than one content-types (usually text/plain and text/html), so the reader can choose which one to display
karthik_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<pinkieval>
it may have the same meaning here
karthik_ has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has joined #ipfs
<tomatopeel>
oh yeah it's something to do with MIME multipart parsing
<tomatopeel>
but does this really apply to files...
<pinkieval>
that would be in the spirit of making ipfs future-proof
karthik_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<tomatopeel>
hmm okay... not super clear on the value here but can accept this and move on for now heh
Kubuxu has joined #ipfs
karthik_ has joined #ipfs
Magik6k has joined #ipfs
pcre has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
karthik_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jkilpatr has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has quit [Quit: Peace Peeps. o/ If you need me asap, message me at msg[(at)]jsgrant.io & I'll try to get back to you within 24-36 hours.]
pcre has joined #ipfs
<Bat`O>
tomatopeel: I think it's for uploading multiple file in a http request
<Bat`O>
when you do a ipfs add (even local), files are streamed by the command line process to the daemon through the http API
stavros has joined #ipfs
<stavros>
hello
<stavros>
how can i connect to my remote ipfs daemon?
<stavros>
so "ipfs pin" on the local machine actually pins on the remote?
jsgrant- has joined #ipfs
bedeho has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<tomatopeel>
Bat`O: so how does that necessitate the multipart file thing? Streaming files across reader/writer interfaces is nice with the Go stdlib right?
chungy has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Kubuxu has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.8]
Magik6k has quit [Quit: Bye!]
bedeho has joined #ipfs
stavros has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<Bat`O>
reader/writer would be the same process, right ?
[0__0] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<xelra>
Try replacing the ipfs binary with a call to "ssh user@x.x.x.x ipfs".
Kubuxu has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has quit [Quit: Peace Peeps. o/ If you need me asap, message me at msg[(at)]jsgrant.io & I'll try to get back to you within 24-36 hours.]
jsgrant- has joined #ipfs
A124 has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
jsgrant- has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Magik6k has joined #ipfs
[0__0] has joined #ipfs
A124 has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has joined #ipfs
<tomatopeel>
Bat`O: same process? what? :o
<tomatopeel>
oh you mean this is for asynchronicity or something?
<Bat`O>
no
onabreak has joined #ipfs
<Bat`O>
i mean that there is two process involved, the daemon and the command line client
<tomatopeel>
yeah and they talk HTTP right?
stavros has joined #ipfs
<tomatopeel>
I'm actually about to start going through some of that code today, so maybe I'll have a better idea soon, heh
<stavros>
can i extend the duration of IPNS names?
<stavros>
or rather, can i make them last much longer when publishing?
<Bat`O>
stavros: there is a ttl option but the real way is to publish periodically
<stavros>
Bat`O, hmm, yeah, that's hard :/
<stavros>
because the target version changes periodically as well
<stavros>
can i at least get the daemon to do that for me?
<stavros>
although it still won't know the latest version, hmm
<Bat`O>
if you want to change the value you have to publish again anyway
<stavros>
yeah, i do publish, i just want a way to point to the latest version without having to go through too much hassle
bedeho has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jsgrant- has quit [Quit: Peace Peeps. o/ If you need me asap, message me at msg[(at)]jsgrant.io & I'll try to get back to you within 24-36 hours.]
Aaron1011 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Aaron1011 has joined #ipfs
Aaron1011 has joined #ipfs
Aaron1011 has quit [Changing host]
bedeho has joined #ipfs
mildred1 has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ulrichard has joined #ipfs
jsgrant- has joined #ipfs
<voker57>
stavros: ipfs daemon automatically republishes your (self) key
bedeho has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
vindelschtuffen_ has joined #ipfs
owlet has joined #ipfs
<stavros>
hmm, i'm seeing the IPFS API daemon never reply to an HTTP POST, has anyone else seen that? looks like it just keeps the connection open
<stavros>
hmm no, it seems to return bad request
<stavros>
odd
bedeho has joined #ipfs
<ttk2[m]>
is there any reason ipfs couldn't be used in a peer to peer only environment (as in nodes ABC, A can talk to the internet B and C can't, but B can talk to A and C can talk to B). From my memory of the whitepaper ipfs doesn't depend on remote lookups just requests to peers however they may be aquired.
bedeho has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<pinkieval>
ttk2[m]: no
<pinkieval>
you can even run a network completely disconnected from the main ipfs network
<stavros>
pinkieval, does that mean A will relay for B and C?
<stavros>
or will the content that's not on A just be unavailable to B and C?
<pinkieval>
I think so
<pinkieval>
but I'm not completely sure
<Magik6k>
There is relay protocol being implemented for that
<Magik6k>
So it's not possible yet
<pinkieval>
oh :(
<ttk2[m]>
so right now B and C could get content that's physically on A but not relay requests?
<Magik6k>
Not yet
<ttk2[m]>
ok then that might be enough for now anyways.
<ttk2[m]>
what's the status of the relay protocol? stalled, active progress, in planning?
Forkk has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<tomatopeel>
whyrusleeping: oh right, thanks. Is this part of any of the DHT specs mentioned in the old whitepaper? I searched for "bootstrap" in the whitepaper
<tomatopeel>
I'm wondering if good old bittorrent had something like this also or not
maxlath has joined #ipfs
<whyrusleeping>
yeah, bittorrent also uses bootstrap nodes
<whyrusleeping>
you have to have some way to initially connect to the network
<tomatopeel>
ah you can't just do like a world-wide broadcast message style thing heh
<tomatopeel>
I always wondered whether questions like this have different answers in ipv6 world
<crankylinuxuser>
IP4 doesn't support multicasting. And broadcasting is killed the moment you hit a 'net router.
<crankylinuxuser>
IP6 does support multicasting, but many places still have shoddy 6 coverage, or bugs in the IP stack, or questionable firewall rules that do really bad things.
lidel has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
ygrek_ has joined #ipfs
shakalaka has quit [Quit: bye.]
btmsn has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
lidel has joined #ipfs
shakalaka has joined #ipfs
shakalaka has quit [Quit: bye.]
galois_d_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
galois_dmz has joined #ipfs
shakalaka has joined #ipfs
owlet has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bedeho has joined #ipfs
rendar has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
chris6131 has joined #ipfs
anewuser has quit [Quit: anewuser]
chris613 has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
ruunyan has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
rendar has quit [Quit: std::lower_bound + std::less_equal *works* with a vector without duplicates!]
ruunyan has joined #ipfs
Caterpillar has quit [Quit: You were not made to live as brutes, but to follow virtue and knowledge.]
espadrine has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<deltab>
crankylinuxuser: 'support multicasting' in what sense? aiui, ipv4 has multicast but WANs don't carry it
jmill has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jaboja has joined #ipfs
<crankylinuxuser>
Ive also found, that it may be part of the spec, nothing really supports it. Obviously broadcast packets are a thing, but I've only found limited devices that even support ACK'ing from ping -b
jmill has joined #ipfs
atrapado_ has joined #ipfs
ianopolous has joined #ipfs
dconroy has joined #ipfs
chris613 has joined #ipfs
chris6131 has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
espadrine has joined #ipfs
markedfinesse has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jmill has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
markedfinesse has joined #ipfs
Oatmeal has joined #ipfs
Encrypt has quit [Quit: Quit]
crankylinuxuser is now known as mpanetta_
mpanetta_ is now known as crankylinuxuser
galois_d_ has joined #ipfs
galois_dmz has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
mildred1 has joined #ipfs
pat36 has quit []
btmsn has joined #ipfs
asyncsec_ has joined #ipfs
asyncsec has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
caladrius has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
mildred1 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.7.1]
mildred has joined #ipfs
mildred has quit [Client Quit]
mildred has joined #ipfs
btmsn has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
mildred has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.7.1]
mildred has joined #ipfs
screensaver has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
screensaver has joined #ipfs
jkilpatr has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
Boomerang has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
ashark has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
bedeho has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ilyaigpetrov has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
atrapado_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
jaboja has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
bedeho has joined #ipfs
<spoonless[m]>
ipv4 does support mutlicasting crankylinuxuser, class D addresses
thefinn93 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.8]
<spoonless[m]>
not sure if mbone is still working, don't think it really took off though
thefinn93 has joined #ipfs
<ruunyan>
why won't "ipfs ls /ipns/xyz" work when the name xyz was published on my own node?
thefinn93 has quit [Client Quit]
thefinn93 has joined #ipfs
dconroy has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
mildred has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
bedeho has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
asyncsec_ has quit [Quit: asyncsec_]
stoopkid has joined #ipfs
dimitarvp has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
asyncsec has joined #ipfs
dimitarvp has joined #ipfs
jmill has joined #ipfs
MDude has joined #ipfs
maxlath has quit [Quit: maxlath]
karthik_ has joined #ipfs
jmill has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
bedeho has joined #ipfs
choriocapillaris has joined #ipfs
shizy has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
bedeho has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
espadrine has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
choriocapillaris has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
zeddd has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
cxl000 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
karthik_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dconroy has joined #ipfs
rcat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
stavros has joined #ipfs
galois_d_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]