Werner changed the topic of #armbian to: armbian - Linux for ARM development boards | www.armbian.com | Github: github.com/armbian | Commits: #armbian-commits | Forums Feed: #armbian-rss | Type 'help' for help | This channel is logged -> irc.armbian.com
<ArmbianTwitter>
@TonyMac_32 (Thomas McKahan): @jonmasters @KevinMulhall @Arm Don't get me wrong, I am a dev/contributor over at Armbian, and had a Mini2440 before the RPi was a thing. (11s ago)
xecuter has joined #armbian
ChriChri_ has joined #armbian
xecuter has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
xecuter has joined #armbian
ChriChri has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
ChriChri_ is now known as ChriChri
DaRock has joined #armbian
sassinak-work has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
sassinak-work has joined #armbian
<Werner>
Good morning
lanefu has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
lanefu has joined #armbian
agrisis has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
_whitelogger has joined #armbian
das_coach has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dddddd has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mrueg has joined #armbian
<IgorPec>
good morning
Heisath has joined #armbian
<Heisath>
Hello there
macc24 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.8]
macc24 has joined #armbian
_whitelogger has joined #armbian
phipli has joined #armbian
plntyk has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<soltys>
hi, is there a way to upgrade from bionic to focal other than loading new image on uSD card?
<soltys>
(for pine A64 2GB version if that matters)
<Werner>
You can try to use do-release-upgrade but it is neither supported nor properly tested.
<soltys>
Werner: I've already been there, but it does not see new lts version. I can only try to update to eoan if I switch from lts to normal in /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades
<soltys>
maybe focal must be somehow 'blessed' by armbian devs to make this work ;)
<Werner>
Nope. It is blocked by Ubuntu. Upgrading from Bionic to Focal will be officially supported by upstream when 20.04.1 of Focal is released
<Werner>
Either wait and try then or do development upgrade by using do-release-upgrade -d
<Werner>
Either way you are on your own when doing so and run into trouble.
<soltys>
sure, I know that I'm on my own here. And I can also always restore old bionic image. But as long as the board will be stable and ethernet/wifi/bt will work then it is ok for me ;)
<soltys>
And I didn't know that I need to wait to 20.04.1 and the -d switch for that tool. ;)
<soltys>
I'm new to the armbian/ubuntu world.
<Werner>
It should work since both Bionic and Focal flavor of Armbian sharing the very same kernel.
<Werner>
But wait...There is a regression you could run into if the initramfs is lz4 compressed.
<Werner>
When you do the upgrade before you restart your system make sure that COMPRESSION is set to gzip in /etc/initramfs/initramfs.conf and recreate the ramdisk with mkinitramfs -u
algyz has joined #armbian
<algyz>
IgorPec Remember I was complaining about oversized 1366x768 resolution? Resolution now 1280x720, but I'm happy with it. How I fixed oversizing? The trick was button on remote control "P.SIZE". 16:9 size was oversized, 4:3 - too smal, with hyge black borders, but "search only" option is ok, now display is on whole screen, not oversized.
igorp_ has joined #armbian
igorp__ has joined #armbian
igorp_ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
wojci has joined #armbian
<wojci>
Hi I'm using a espressobin v5 board. I'm wondering if I can use the 3 Ethernet interfaces as just interfaces .. without any bridging done? What do I have to do to disable bridging? I tried to configure lan0 to a static adress and while the device received pings (I ran tcpdump -i lan0 -v -n) from another host on same network it didn't reply.
agrisis has joined #armbian
igorp__ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
sassinak-work has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
sassinak-work has joined #armbian
algyz has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Heisath has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
xecuter has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Net147 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
plntyk has joined #armbian
<lanefu>
wojci: yeah make sure you've disabled the bridging and aren't assigning anything to eth0... its been a while so i don't exactly remember... might be some clues on this thread
<Miouyouyou>
So, basically, make sure you can use the build script with Github Actions builders, for any configuration ?
<IgorPec>
well, there are many (small) problems :)
<IgorPec>
if we use self hosted runners, we can do anything
<Miouyouyou>
Indeed. Self hosted runners tend to be a little more versatile too.
<IgorPec>
but with public ones, its bit diffucult ... and caching is a problem. each time from scratch takes time
<Miouyouyou>
There's some caching mechanisms build into Github Actions. They can be used if you always build with the same kernel sources, for example.
<IgorPec>
is it? also how to use prepared docker image from docker hub
<IgorPec>
i made an action to update this image and push to hub, but nothing from here
<IgorPec>
also it is nice to have compilers integrated
<Miouyouyou>
Well, they have https://github.com/actions/cache . It's a bit difficult to use, buuut you can do it, yeah. For docker things, I have a few examples.
rdorsch`away is now known as rdorsch
macc24_ has joined #armbian
macc24 has quit [Disconnected by services]
macc24_ is now known as macc24
<Miouyouyou>
Well, I have docker BUILD examples. I should try running things with docker, see if that works well. It's how the Gitlab runners work though, so I guess they have this feature
<Miouyouyou>
No, wait, I have docker-compose examples which I used to generate automatic builds... it still tends to fail sometimes because the Github runner suddenly b0rks out with Docker.
<IgorPec>
but so far i only did few tests, so it works. only tagging has to be changed i think - in our script
<Miouyouyou>
Nice ! I'll give it a try with Github actions then.
<IgorPec>
script has not awareness that image is there to pull it
<Miouyouyou>
Be careful with "Github" Docker repository though. It looks like a nice feature but it requires authentication, which makes it useless in a lot of cases...
<IgorPec>
well, its good enough to prepare our images ... or?
<Miouyouyou>
Hmm, docker is able to check whether it has the image already or not, and download it if didn't.
macc24 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.8]
<Miouyouyou>
The official Docker repository is the best. (hub.docker.com) . Github Actions is also cool. It's just Github Docker Repo that I don't like ( https://github.com/Miouyouyou?tab=packages )
macc24 has joined #armbian
<IgorPec>
ahaa
<IgorPec>
don't have intention to use this feature ;)
<Miouyouyou>
Good :)
<IgorPec>
pushing to docker hub is operational
<Miouyouyou>
Nice !
<IgorPec>
ist there any action for deb packing?
<IgorPec>
that is plug&play
<Miouyouyou>
Hmm ? The image should be able to do it. I don't think Github actions provide such features.
<Miouyouyou>
This is something that will need to be scripted. However, you can either build a docker image that will do this automatically, or setup a script within Github Actions.
<Miouyouyou>
Generally, the way it works with Docker is that you mount a volume (or folder) inside the image, where you want to store persisent data (builds for example) and then let the image do its job inside these folders.
<IgorPec>
aha, how to you use docker image from docker hub?
<Miouyouyou>
Just use docker run, or you can create a "docker-compose.yml" and then use docker-compose. You might have to apt install docker.io docker-compose beforehand, but it generally works directly.